Photodynamic Toxicity of Chlorophyllin against Fasciola gigantica Carrier Snail Indoplanorbis exustus in Visible Spectral Band

Chaturvedi, Kumar Singh, and Kumar Singh: Photodynamic Toxicity of Chlorophyllin against Fasciola gigantica Carrier Snail Indoplanorbis exustus in Visible Spectral Band

Authors

INTRODUCTION

Fasciolosis is water and food borne zoonotic disease caused by two trematode species Fasciola hepatica and F. gigantica.1,2 As being linked with fasciolosis it cause dramatic losses of economic prosperity of any country and classified as re-emerging human disease.3 It caused low fertility, reduced meat and milk yield in infected cattle population.3 In early eighties, Singh and Agarwal4 noted that 94% of buffaloes slaughtered at the abattoirs in Gorakhpur district of eastern Uttar Pradesh (India), are infected by Fasciola gigantica, which still persisted as well.5,6 The increase in number of human fasciolosis and its outbreaks in the last two decades have changed the status of fasciolosis from zoonoses to an emerging health problem.7 Snails belonging to families Planorbidae and Lymnaeidae are the secondary host of Fasciola gigantica.5 Planorbidae snail Indoplanorbis exustus is acknowledged intermediate host of Fasciola gigantica in Gorakhpur, India.8

Logical approach for the fasciolosis control is to devastate the carrier snails and thus eliminate an essential link in the life cycle of the Fasciola. Use of bioactive plant molluscicides is a valuable tool in controlling the vector population as they are easily formulated, ecologically safe and culturally more acceptable than their synthetic counterpart.9,10 Chlorophyllin has natural photodynamic properties and simply extracted from various plant resources (e.g. spinach, grass, dandelion, green cabbage, water hyacinth, algae etc.).11,12 Erzinger13 has reported that photosensitive chlorophyllin show highly toxic effects against mosquito larvae in sunlight. Earlier research revealed the molluscicidal activity of chlorophyllin against L. stagnalis, Biomphalaria spp. and Physa marmorata.14 In the presence of light chlorophyllin becomes more effective and toxic.11,15 In recent times, it has been reported that chlorophyllin is a potent cercaricide against F. gigantica cercaria larva in sunlight.16 Previously, it has been observed that different spectral bands of the visible light stimulate the orientation and locomotion of snails towards the light source.17 It have been noted that snail Lymnaea acuminata monitor the intensity variation of visible light.5,18 Photodynamic killing of snails is one of the newly developed methods for controlling vector-borne diseases. This approach can be effectively utilized as a part of integrated approach for controlling and eliminating fasciolosis. The objective of the present study is to assess the potential efficacy of photodynamic chlorophyllin against the snail Indoplanorbis exustus in visible spectral bands of light.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pure Compound

Chlorophyllin is purchased from sigma chemical Co.USA.

Experimental animal

Adult Indoplanorbis exustus (0.95 ± 0.026 cm in length) were collected locally from Ramgarh lake and low-lying submerged fields. The animals were acclimatized for 72 h in laboratory condition. Experimental animals were kept in glass aquaria containing 3l of dechlorinated tap water maintained at room temperature (22-25°C). The pH of the water was 7.1-7.3 and dissolved oxygen, free carbon dioxide and bicarbonate alkalinity were 6.5-7.1, 5.2-6.2 and 102-104 mg/l, respectively. Dead animals were removed immediately from the aquaria to avoid any contamination.

Preparation of chlorophyllin

Preparation of chlorophyllin was done according to the method of Wohllebe et al.19 as modified by Singh and Singh.16 Chlorophyll was isolated from spinach (Spinacia oleracea) using 100% ethanol (for about 2 h at 55°C). Then, CaCO3 (about 1mg/g plant material) was added as a buffer, it prevents the transformation of chlorophyll into pheophytin. The extract was subsequently filtered using Whatman qualitative filter papers (Whatman International Ltd, UK) and 50 ml petroleum benzene was added. After shaking the mixture, the chlorophyll moved into the lipophilic benzene phase. The two phases were separated in separatory funnel and about 1.0 ml methanolic KOH was added to 50 ml of the benzene phase. Upon agitation, the chlorophyll came into contact with the methanolic KOH and was transformed into water-soluble chlorophyllin (This process occurs due to the breakage of the ester bond between the chlorophyllin and the phytol tail by saponification). After separation of the methanolic KOH phase and the benzene phase most of the chlorophyllin was found in KOH phase. The extract was stored in a dark flask at room temperature. However, only fresh chemicals were used in the course of these experiments.

Design of photo toxicity experiments

Light experiment was set up according to the method of Tripathi et al.5 Xenon arc lamp (500 W) was used as visible light source. Interference colored filters was used to perform the spectral response between 400 nm to 650 nm. Exposure of visible light at different wavelengths and fix intensity (500 W/m2) was used against the chlorophyllin treated snails to observe their mortality. Toxicity experiments were done at normal room temperature (22-25°C).

Thin layer chromatography

Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was performed according to the method of Barone and Tansey20 as modified by Upadhyay and Singh.21 Thin layer chromatography was carried out on 20×20 cm precoated silica gel (Merck Specialities Private Limited, Mumbai, India) using benzene/ethyl acetate (9:1, w/v) as the mobile phase. The loading of extracted chlorophyllin with pure chlorophyllin were applied on TLC plates with a micropipette. TLC plates were developed with iodine vapour. Copies of chromatogram were made by tracing the plates immediately and Rf value were calculated.

High performance liquid chromatography

Identification of active component present in chlorophyllin was done by HPLC.

Sample preparation

The sample of extracted chlorophyllin was prepared by weighing 50 mg and then dissolving in 20 ml of acetonitrile. The sample was properly vortexed to ensure dissolution. Prior to injected 20 µl sample, the solutions was passed through a Millipore filter (ultra filter disc 3K 43 mm 10 pk, Cole Parmer, Germany) to remove any undissolved particles.

Preparation of standard solution

Pure standard solution of chlorophyllin was prepared by diluting 10 mg chlorophyllin in 20 ml of acetonitrile. The mixture was vortexed to ensure proper dissolution of pure compound. The solution, thus obtained, was passed through Millipore filter (ultra filter disc 3K 43 mm 10 pk, Cole Parmer, Germany).

Instrumentation

The HPLC system was equipped with two LC- 10ATVP pumps, a Cecil CE 4201 UV- variable detector and a Microliter®#702 (Hamilton-Bonaduz, Schweiz) syringe with a loop size of 20 µl. Reverse-phase chromatographic analysis was carried out under isocratic conditions using a reverse-phase Luna 5 µ C18 Phenomenex column (250×4.6 mm) at 27°C. Acetonitrile (HPLC grade) was used as the mobile phase solvent under a pressure of 260-270 Kgf/cm2 and run time of 15 min. The analysis was carried out a flow rate of one ml/min., the extracted chlorophyllin effluent being monitored at 220 nm. Data acquisition were done with Power Stream™ software.

Treatment protocol for concentration-response relationship

Toxicity experiments were done according to the method of Singh and Agarwal.22 A total of 10 snails were placed in a glass aquarium containing 3 l of dechlorinated tap water. Snails were treated with different concentrations of extracted and pure chlorophyllin and incubated for 4 h in darkness. Thereafter, in I set of experiment the extracted and pure chlorophyllin treated snails were exposed to sunlight. In II set of experiment extracted chlorophyllin treated snails were exposed to different spectral band of monochromatic visible light. The control animals were kept in the equal volume of water under similar conditions without treatment. In control group, I snails were exposed to sunlight without any treatment. In control group II snails were exposed to monochromatic visible lights without any treatment. Each experiment was replicated 6 times. Mortality of snails was recorded at 24 h up to 96 h. The dead animals were removed immediately to avoid any contamination in aquarium water. The mortality of snails was established by the contraction of body within the shell, no response to needle probe was taken as evidence of death.

Concentration mortality data for each group of snails were analyzed using the probit log analysis program, POLO-PC (LeOra Software) Robertson et al.23 to estimate the LC50 of extracted chlorophyllin and the 95% confidence intervals for these concentrations. The slope of the probit lines was also estimated. This program ran chi-square test for goodness of fit of the data to the probit model. If the model fits, the calculated value of chi-square is less than the chi-square table value for the appropriate degrees of freedom. If the model does not fit, the LC50 value for the particular population may not be reliably estimated and is adjusted with the heterogeneity factor (Observed chi-square values divided degrees of freedom). This program uses heterogeneity factor as a correlation factor when the value of Pearson’s chi-square statistic is significant as P < 0.05. The index of significance for potency estimation (g-value) was used to calculate 95% confidence intervals for potency (relative potency is equivalent to tolerance ratio). Parallelism of the probit regression lines implies a constant relative potency at all levels of response. POLO-PC was used to test equality and parallelism of the slope of the probit lines Robertson et al.23 The regression coefficient between exposure time and different values of LC50 was determined by the method of Sokal and Rohlf.24

RESULTS

The molluscicidal activity of extracted/pure chlorophyllin was tested at different time of exposure to various light spectra and chlorophyllin concentration against the pest Indoplanorbis exustus (Table 1). A significant (p < 0.05) negative regression was noted in between the exposure time and LC50 of the treatments (Table 2). The LC50 at 96 h of pure and extracted chlorophyllin was 6.54 mg/l and 939.65 mg/l in sunlight (Table 2). Toxicity was noted in the presence of visible spectral band of lights at fix intensity (500 W/m2). The highest toxicity was noted in yellow light (LC50 at 96 h: 2016.79 mg/l) and lowest in green light (LC50 at 96 h: 2433.16 mg/l) (Table 3).

Table 1

Concentration of extracted and pure chlorophyllin used in toxicity experiment against Indoplanorbis exustus

Experimental conditionδChemicalδConcentration (mg/l)
SunlightExt Chl900, 1000, 1100, 1200
Pure Chl10, 20, 30, 40
Different spectra of lightExt Chl1900, 2100, 2300, 2500

[i] Abbreviation: Ext- Extracted, Chl- Chlorophyllin

Table 2

Toxicity of extracted and pure chlorophyllin in sunlight against Indoplanorbis exustus

Exposure PeriodTreatmentLC50 mg/l (w/v)LCLUCLSlope valuet-ratiog-valueHeterogeneity
24 hExt Chl1371.591232.312020.216.68 ± 2.033.280.350.15
Pure Chl37.2229.6956.541.87±0.404.640.170.23
48 hExt Chl1187.431118.121364.557.28 ± 1.853.910.250.16
Pure Chl22.5716.9730.241.48±0.373.990.240.25
72 hExt Chl1028.96964.451088.747.13 ± 1.793.970.240.27
Pure Chl15.7011.0319.571.75±0.374.650.170.64
96 hExt Chl939.65883.78976.6211.35 ± 1.995.690.110.44
Pure Chl6.542.549.661.85±0.434.280.200.35

[i] Six batches of ten snails were exposed to different concentration. Mortality was determined at 24 h to 96 h. Concentrations given are the final concentration (w/v) in the glass aquarium water. Abbreviation: Ext- Extracted, Chl- Chlorophyllin, LCL- Lower confidence limit, UCL-Upper confidence limit. Significant negative regression (p < 0.05) was observed between exposure time and LC50 treatments. Ts – testing significant of the regression coefficient- Ext Chl -8.804+ to -3.315+ and 102.8++ to 2155++ and Pure Chl -0.6134+ to -0.2108+ and 0.0++ to 90.37++ was observed. +Linear regression between X and Y. ++Non- linear regression between X and Y.

Table 3

Toxicity of extracted chlorophyllin in the presence of different spectra of light against Indoplanorbis exustus

Exposure periodTreatmentDifferent spectra of lightLC50mg/l (w/v)LCLUCLSlope valuest-ratiog-valueHeterogeneity
24 hExt ChlGreen2844.622612.403628.839.99±2.603.830.260.38
Violet2739.812554.343259.6910.43±2.464.230.210.32
Blue2592.332592.332866.1211.66±2.344.980.150.26
Orange2548.532415.692851.259.67±2.104.590.180.29
Red2440.942330.232663.539.35±2.004.670.170.26
White2320.462233.792451.6010.11±1.975.130.140.15
Yellow2235.962171.542309.2613.46±2.046.590.080.17
48 hExt ChlGreen2760.962520.883734.577.16±2.093.410.320.17
Violet2681.702480.023360.567.61±2.063.680.280.20
Blue2464.912351.452697.309.59±2.034.720.170.17
Orange2387.512291.202557.419.91±1.994.960.150.26
Red2299.502220.642409.0211.03±1.995.540.120.26
White2178.422097.682259.4610.95±1.955.600.120.20
Yellow2151.632082.412217.1213.13±2.026.490.090.29
72 hExt ChlGreen2588.502408.733189.627.04±1.983.540.300.13
Violet2520.122379.552870.958.32±2.004.150.220.19
Blue2355.482263.032509.119.84±1.974.980.150.13
Orange2274.732185.512398.549.47±1.934.900.150.26
Red2172.882092.682252.2811.08±1.965.640.120.31
White2117.442034.182189.0511.58±1.975.850.110.22
Yellow2075.052003.812133.9214.33±2.096.840.080.33
96 hExt ChlGreen2433.162295.352792.546.99±1.903.660.280.22
Violet2380.572241.282747.466.30±1.883.330.340.11
Orange2125.442029.612207.6810.18±1.945.190.140.29
Red2089.262005.032157.8512.00±2.005.990.100.23
White2029.921946.672092.6513.62±2.116.440.090.39
Yellow2016.791950.422069.1417.05±2.337.300.070.44

[i] Six batches of ten snails were exposed to different concentration. Mortality was determined at every 24 h up to 96 h. Concentrations given are the final concentration (w/v) in the glass aquarium water. Abbreviation: Ext- Extracted, Chl- Chlorophyllin, LCL- Lower confidence limit, UCL-Upper confidence limit. Significant negative regression (p < 0.05) was observed between exposure time and LC50 of treatments. Ts – testing significant of the regression coefficient of Green light -10.11+ to -2.93+ and 1531++ to 3750++, Violet light -6.90+ to -2.10+ and 1805++ to 3350++ , Blue light -5.60+ to -4.53+ and 1557++ to 3256++ , Orange light -6.88+ to -4.63+ and 1365++ to 3297++ , Red light -6.60+ to -3.24+ and 1418++ to 3078++ , White light -5.94+ to -1.82+ and 1479++ to 2814++ , Yellow light -3.81+ to -2.30+ and 1589++ to 2627++ was observed. +Linear regression between X and Y. ++Non- linear regression between X and Y.

The thin layer chromatography analysis demonstrated that the Rf value of extracted chlorophyllin (0.50) was nearly equivalent to the Rf value of pure chlorophyllin (0.48). The identification of active components was done by comparing the retention time (Rt) and chromatographic peaks of extracted chlorophyllin and pure chlorophyllin. The HPLC fingerprint profile of the extracted chlorophyllin showed major peaks at the retention time of 10.89 min. (Figure 2) whereas the pure standard solutions of chlorophyllin showed major peaks at the retention time of 1.74 min. (Figure 3).

Figure 1

Transformation of chlorophyll in chlorophyllin from spinach (Spinacia oleracea).

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-9-729_img_1.jpg
Figure 2

High Performance Liquid Chromatography of extracted chlorophyllin.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-9-729_img_2.jpg
Figure 3

High Performance Liquid Chromatography of pure chlorophyllin.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-9-729_img_3.jpg

The slope values given in Tables 2 and 3 were steep and separate estimates of LC based on each of six replicates were found to be within the 95% confidence limits of LC50. The t-ratio was higher than 1.96 and heterogeneity factor was less than 1.0. The g-value was less than 0.5 at all probability levels (90, 95 and 99 respectively) (Tables 2 and 3). There was significant negative regression (p < 0.05) between the exposure time and LC50 of the treatments (Tables 2 and 3).

DISCUSSION

The data given above indicate that chlorophyllin pure/extracted from spinach is very effective and efficient molluscicide. Toxicity against the snail Indoplanorbis exustus is time and concentration dependent as evident by the negative regression between exposure period and LC50 values of the different treatments. Toxicity of photodynamic chlorophyllin is noted against I. exustus in the occurrence of different visible spectral bands of lights at a fix intensity of 500 W/m2. All the monochromatic visible lights have adequate energy to elicit the response of photodynamic chlorophyllin. Yellow light caused higher toxicity of chlorophyllin against snails than other monochromatic visible lights. Significant variation in toxicity of chlorophyllin exposed to same intensity of visible monochromatic light is evident from different LC50 of chlorophyllin. All lights have different wavelengths and it represents that variation in wavelength of light has significant effect on mortality, as evident from highest toxicity of chlorophyllin was observed in yellow light (LC50 at 96 h: 2016.79 mg/l) and lowest in green light (LC50 at 96 h: 2433.16 mg/l).

Recently, Singh and Singh16 demonstrated the larvicidal activity of chlorophyllin against F. gigantica at the fix intensity of 300 W/m2. The effectiveness of chlorophyllin depends on light attenuation in the water body.25 Relating to attenuation it was tested earlier that about 36 W/m2 of visible day light are sufficient to stimulate photodynamic destruction of Chaoborus crystallinus larvae.26 The time-dependent toxic effect of tested plant products may be due to the uptake of active compound by the snails, which progressively accumulated in the body with an increase exposure period. It is also possible that the active compound could change into more toxic forms in the aquarium water or in the snails body in visible band spectra of light.

When sunlight penetrates water at a marked angle then longer visible wavelength are absorbed more by water than shorter visible wavelengths during penetration.27,16 The toxicity experiments clearly demonstrated that pure chlorophyllin is more toxic than extracted chlorophyllin and chlorophyllin become more effective in sunlight than different spectral band of monochromatic visible lights. It may be due to higher solubilized atom of chlorophyllin in sunlight transferred its excitation energy to oxygen, which generate singlet oxygen and other reactive oxygen species (ROS), which have the potential to kill the vector organism.28,29,15 ROS caused strong oxidative stress to the cells which damage the cell membrane, protein, DNA and other cell structures.30,31 Photodynamic chlorophyllin was capable to kill mosquito larvae and other small animals within a few hours in sunlight.11 Recent research on chlorophyllin has been advocated by researchers. As Erzinger et al.32 demonstrated that photodynamic chlorophyllin was able to kill four different species, a small crustacean (Daphnia similis), a unicellular alga (Euglena gracilis) and two species of fish (Astyanax bimaculatus and Cyprynus carpio) which are the vector of parasitic diseases. Earlier, Kumar and Singh33 reported that chlorophyllin show toxic effects against Lymnaea acuminata in the presence of red visible light and sunlight. Recently, Hader et al.15 reported the toxicity of photodynamically active chlorophyllin against fish ectoparasite Ichthiophthirius multifiliis, Ichtyobodo, Dactylogyrus, Trichodina, Argulus.

The steep slope indicates that a small increase in the concentration of molluscicide caused higher mortality. The t-ratio value greater than 1.96 indicates that the regression is significant (p< 0.05). The heterogeneity factor value less than 1.0 denotes that in the replicate test of random samples; the concentration response is limited and thus the model fits the data adequately. The index of significance of the potency estimation g indicates that the value of the mean is within the limit at all probability levels (90, 95 and 99 respectively) since it is less than 0.5.

Thin layer chromatography (TLC) study demonstrates the preliminary identification of the active components in extracted and pure chlorophyllin. The co-migration of extracted and pure chlorophyllin on TLC plate show nearly equivalent Rf value of extracted (0.50) and pure (0.48) chlorophyllin. The stationary phase, silica gel can be considered polar while the organic solvent used as the mobile phase is non-polar.34 Components of mixture differ in polarity and have different tendencies to absorb onto the silica gel or dissolve in the organic solvent.35 The more polar components have a stronger interaction with the silica gel and absorb on the silica gel strongly, therefore, less distance it can travel up the plate and show lower Rf value. In contrast, non-polar components move higher up the plate and show higher Rf value.34,35

High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) has already been considered to be the simplest and most reproducible technique for analyzing complex mixtures of pigments in food and other sources. HPLC fingerprinting is the best way for chemical characterization.36

Willstatter and Escher37 discovered that chlorophyll was a mixture of two compounds which were designated as chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b. Chlorophyll a contains –CH3 group and chlorophyll b contain –CHO group, respectively and after removal of phytol tail chlorophyll converts into chlorophyllin (Figure 1).38 It was reported by Lim,39 that the replacement of –CH3 group (in chlorophyll a) with –CHO group (in chlorophyll b) at the position C-7 increases the polarity of the chlorophyll b; since chlorophyll b becomes more polar than chlorophyll a and appears on the shorter retention time. It was also reported that the retention time always decreases in the same order (pheophytin a > chlorophyll a > pheophytin b > chlorophyll b > chlorophyllide a > chlorophyllide b) and predominantly depends on the polarity of the mobile phase.39,40 In the present study the separation of chlorophyll derivates by HPLC method clearly demonstrate the major peaks at the retention time of 10.89 min. in extracted chlorophyllin and 1.74 min. in pure standard chlorophyllin. From the above reporting, it can be state that higher retention time indicates the presence of chlorophyllin a in extracted chlorophyllin41,42 and comparatively lower retention time indicates the presence of chlorophyllin b in pure chlorophyllin. In present observation, major peaks of the retention time of chlorophyllin a and b clearly demonstrate that these are the active components which are found more abundantly in extracted and pure chlorophyllin, respectively. Now, the HPLC data clearly define the minor differences between the Rf values of TLC results. It can also be concluded that the toxicity of extracted chlorophyllin is due to chlorophyllin a than chlorophyllin b.

CONCLUSION

The laboratory studies reported in this work demonstrate that photodynamic chlorophyllin is very powerful and adequate molluscicide for target vector snails. It can be avowed that molluscicidal activity of chlorophyllin is due to their active components: chlorophyllin a and b. Such type of exploratory research work by means of plant extracts can be effective approach to kill the snail population. Being economically and environmentally friendly, this approach can get high public acceptance also. Photodynamic chlorophyllin as a molluscicide show great potential of photosensitization prospective for the control of endemic fasciolosis in developing countries.

Acknowledgements

he authors are grateful to Prof. D. K. Singh (Department of Zoology, DDU Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, India) for his valuable suggestions in analysis and interpretation of data and preparation of the final manuscript.

Notes

[4] Conflicts of interest CONFLICTS OF INTEREST We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

ABBREVIATIONS USED

TLC

Thin Layer Chromatography

HPLC

High Performance Liquid Chromatography

Ext

Extracted

Chl

Chlorophyllin

REFERENCES

1 

Ashrafi K, Bargues MD, O’Neill S, Mas-Coma S , editors. Fascioliasis: a worldwide parasitic disease of importance in travel medicine. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2014;12(6):636–49

2 

Singh DJ, Singh DK , editors. Anthelmintic activity of chlorophyllin against different larval stages of Fasciola gigantica. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2016;58:39

3 

Cwiklinski K, Allen K, LaCourse J, Williams DJ, Paterson S, Hodgkinson JE , editors. Characterization of a novel panel of polymorphic microsatellite loci for the liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica, using next generation sequencing approach. Infect Genet Evol. 2015;32:298–304

4 

Singh O, Agarwal RA , editors. Toxicity of certain pesticides to two economic species of snails in Northern India. J Econ Entomol. 1981;74(5):568–71

5 

Tripathi AP, Singh VK, Singh DK , editors. Orientation of the snail Lymnaea acuminata to different wavelength of visible light. The Ecoscan. 2013;4:235–40

6 

Sunita K, Habib M, Kumar P, Singh VK, Husain SK, Singh DK , editors. Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase and cytochrome oxidase activity in Fasciola gigantica cercaria by phytoconstituents. Acta Tropica. 2016;154:19–24

7 

Nyindo M, Lukambagire A , editors. Fasciolosis: An ongoing zoonotic trematode infection. Biomed Res Int Volume. 2015;ID786195. 8

8 

Soni N, Singh VK , editors. Molluscicidal activity of Tamarindus indica and Terminalia arjuna against Indoplanorbis exustus: A causative agent of Trematodiasis. Sci Agric. 2015;12:163–70

9 

Soni N, Singh DK, Singh VK , editors. Inhibition kinetics of acetylcholinesterase and phosphatase by the active constituents of Terminalia arjuna and Tamarindus indica in the cerebral ganglion of Lymnaea acuminata. Pharmacogn J. 2017;9(2):98–101

10 

Tekwu EM, Bosompem KM, Anyan WK, Appiah-Opong R, Owusu KB, Tettey MD , editors. In vitro assessment of anthelmintic activities of Rauwolfia vomitoria (Apocynaceae) stem bark and roots against parasitic stages of Schistosoma mansoni and Cytotoxic Study. J Parasitol Res Volume. 2017;(2017). 2583969. 11

11 

Wohllebe S, Richter R, Richter P, Hader DP , editors. Photodynamic control of human pathogenic parasites in aquatic ecosystems using chlorophyllin and pheophorbid as photodynamic substances. Parasitol Res. 2009;104(3):593–600

12 

Singh DJ, Singh DK , editors. Phytotherapy of chlorophyllin exposed Lymnaea acumi nata: A new biotechnological tool for fasciolosis control. Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2016;1(2):20–5

13 

Erzinger GS , editor. New perspectives for the control of parasitic diseases through the use of photodynamic products. Pharma Anal Acta. 2011;9:1–3

14 

Mahmoud MS, Richter P, Shalaby HAM, Kandil OM, Hader DP , editors. Molluscicidal activity of chlorophyll extraction against the freshwater snails. J Coastal Life Med. 2013;1:85–8

15 

Hader DP, Schmidl J, Hilbig R, Oberle M, Wedekind H, Richter P , editors. Fighting fish parasites with photodynamically active chlorophyllin. Parasitol Res. 2016;115(6):2277–83

16 

Singh DJ, Singh DK , editors. Toxicity of chlorophyllin in different wavelengths of visible light against Fasciola gigantica larvae. J Photochem Photobiol B: Biol. 2015;144:57–60

17 

Sakakibara M, Aritaka T, Iizuka A, Suzuki H, Horikoshi T, Lukowiak K , editors. Electrophysiological responses to light of neurons in the eye and statocyst of Lymnaea stagnalis. J Neurophysiol. 2005;93(1):493–507

18 

Tripathi AP, Singh VK, Singh DK , editors. Attraction of Lymnaea acuminata against the visible photo stimulant: A new tool in fasciolosis control. Research. 2014;1::743

19 

Wohllebe S, Ulbrich C, Grimm D, Pietsch J, Erzinger G, Richter R , editors. Photodynamic treatment of Chaoborus crystallinus larvae with chlorophyllin induces necrosis and apoptosis. Photochem Photobiol. 2011;87(5):1113–22

20 

Barone FE, Tansey MK , editors. Isolation, purification, identification, synthesis and kinetics of activity of the anticandial component of Allium sativum and hypothesis for its mode of action. Mycologia. 1977;88:793–825

21 

Upadhyay A, Singh DK , editors. Molluscicidal activity of Sapindus mukorossi and Terminalia chebula against the freshwater snail Lymnaea acuminata. Chemosphere. 2011;83(4):468–74

22 

Singh DK, Agarwal RA , editors. Correlation of the anticholinesterase and molluscicidal activity of the latex of Euphorbia royleana Bioss. on Lymnaea acuminata. J Nat Prod. 1984;47(4):702–5

23 

Robertson JL, Russell RM, Preisler HK, Savin NE , editors. Bioassay with arthropods, POLO computer programme for analysis of bioassay data. 2nd ed. (Boca Raton:). CRC Press. 2007;1–224

24 

Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ , editors. Introduction to biostatistics. (San Francisco). W.H. Freeman and Co. 1996;271–73

25 

DeRosa MC, Crutchley RJ , editors. Photosensitized singlet oxygen and its applications. Coord Chem Rev. 2002;233:234:351–71

26 

Erzinger GS, Wohllebe S, Vollrath F, Souza SC, Richter P, Lebert M , editors. Optimizing conditions for the use of chlorophyll derivatives for photodynamic control of parasites in aquatic ecosystems. Parasitol Res. 2011;109(3):781–6

27 

Vanderstaete J, Goossens R, Ghabour JK , editors. Bathymetric mapping of coral reefs in the red sea (Hurghada-Egypt) using LANDSTAT7 ETM+DATA, seventh international conference on remote sensing for marine and coastal environments, Miami, Florida, 20-22 May. 2002;

28 

Tominaga H, Kodama S, Matsuda N, Suzuki K, Watanabe M , editors. Involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the induction of genetic instability by radiation. J Radiat Res. 2004;45(2):181–8

29 

Richter PR, Strauch SM, Azizullah A, Hader DP , editors. Chlorophyllin as a possible measure against vectors of human parasites and fish parasites. Front Environ Sci. 2014;2:1–6

30 

Kohen R, Nyska A , editors. Oxidation of biological system: oxidative stress phenomena, antioxidants, redox reactions, and methods for their quantification. Toxicol Pathol. 2002;30:6–620. –50

31 

Singh K, Singh VK , editors. Anti-reproductive activity of chlorophyllin on fresh water snail Lymnaea acuminata. Res J Parasitol. 2015;10:160–6

32 

Erzinger GS, Souza SC, Pinto LH, Hoppe R, Del-Ciampo LF, Souza O , editors. et al. Assessment of the impact of chlorophyll derivatives to control parasites in aquatic ecosystems. Ecotoxicol. 2015;24(4):949–58

33 

Kumar N, Singh VK , editors. Bait formulations of chlorophyllin against infected/uninfected Lymnaea acuminata in red and sunlight. Int J Zool Res. 2015;11(5):207–14

34 

Sasidharan S, Chen Y, Saravanan D, Sundram KM, Latha LY , editors. Extraction, Isolation and characterization of bioactive compounds from plants’ extracts. A J T C A M. 2011;8(1):1–10

35 

Lu J, Ma HY, Zhang W, Ma ZG, Yao S , editors. Separation of berberine hydrochloride and tetrahydropalmatine and their quantitative analysis with thin layer chromatography involved with ionic liquids. J Anal Methods Chem. 2015;Volume 2015:642401. –7

36 

Springfield EP, Eagles PKF, Scott G , editors. Qualitative assessment of South African herbal medicine by means of HPLC fingerprinting. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;101:75–83

37 

Willstatter R, Escher HH , editors. Uber das Lutein des Huhnereidotters. Z Physiolog Chem. 1912;76:214–25

38 

Rudiger W , editor. Biosynthesis of chlorophylls a and b and the chlorophyll circle. Photosynth Res. 2002;74:187–93

39 

Lim CK , editor. High performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry of phorphyrins, chlorophylls and bilins. World Scientific Publishing Co., SGP. 2009;177

40 

Gauthier A , editor. Improved method to track chlorophyll degradation. Food Chem. 2001;49(3):1117–22

41 

Milenkovic SM, Zvezdanovic JB, Andelkovic TD, Markovic DZ , editors. The identification of chlorophyll and its derivatives in the pigment mixtures: HPLC-chromatography, visible and mass spectroscopy studies. Adv Tech. 2012;1(1):16–24

42 

Hsu CY, Yeh TH, Huang MY, Hu SP, Chao PY, Yang CM , editors. Organ-specific distribution of chlorophyll related compounds from dietary spinach in rabbits. Indian J Biochem Biophys. 2014;51:388–95

ABOUT AUTHORS

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-9-729_img_5.jpg

Divya Chaturvedi, Research Scholar of Malacology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, DDU Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, UP, India. She has completed her UG and PG from DDU Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur and enrolled for her doctorate studied under the supervision of Dr. Vinay Kumar Singh. She has published 2 papers in an international journal and working on isolation, characterization and biological evaluation of natural products and pest control, vector-borne diseases from three years.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-9-729_img_6.jpg

Professor D. K. Singh, Malacology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, DDU Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, UP, India has university teaching and research experiences of more than 32 years. Current research interests are toxicology and molluscan physiology. He has published 182 research papers, 14 review articles in 75 leading International Journals of repute with high impact factors. Dr. Singh publications have got 3019 citations all over world having 28 H-index and 87 i-10 index. Prof Singh has produced 27 Ph.D. and successfully conducted 15 research projects.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-9-729_img_7.jpg

Dr. Vinay Kumar Singh, Assistant Professor stage-III, Department of Zoology, DDU Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, UP, India has university teaching and research experiences of more than 20 years. Current research interests are isolation, characterization and biological evaluation of natural products and pest control, vector-borne diseases. He has published 116 research papers, 11 review articles in 70 leading International Journals of repute with high impact factors. Dr. Singh has produced 11 Ph.D. students. Dr. Singh publications have got 808 citations all over world having 17 H-index and 23 i-10 index. Dr. Singh is serving as Editor-in-Chief of Research Journal of Parasitology, USA. Dr. Singh was nominated as member of University Court (JNU) by Hon’ble President of India.