Shelf Life Evaluation of Trivrit Avaleha - A Preliminary Assessment

Rajput, Mata, Ruknuddin, and Dei: Shelf Life Evaluation of Trivrit Avaleha - A Preliminary Assessment

Authors

Introduction

1.

Shelf life is the time period during which a drug product is expected to remain within the approved life specification, provided that it is stored under the conditions defined on the container label.[1] Shelf life is the time required for 10% of the material to disappear; it is the time at which molar concentration of the reactant has decreased to 90% of its initial concentration.[2] In ayurvedic literature, shelf life is known as Saviryata Avadhi refers to the time period during which a drug remains potent. The information regarding the concept of shelf life for different dosage forms is found scattered in Brihatrayi like Shelf life of Vati (tablet) and Churna (powder) is one Prahara (3 hours) and 2-3 months respectively. Acarya Caraka explained that a aushdhi (drug) can be utilized for treatment purposes until it maintains its fragrance, color, taste etc.[3] After that Acarya Sharangadhara[4] opines that the Avaleha start to lose their therapeutic potency after a year, while Yogaratnakara[5] opines the period as six months. Trivrit Avaleha[6] (TA) is composed of Trivrit (Operculina turpethum Linn.), Trijata (Cinnamomum tamala Nees and Eberm., Cinnamomum zeylanicum Breyn., Elettaria cadamomum Maton.), Madhu (honey) and Khandasarkarā (sugar candy). It is an important formulations used frequently to induce Virecana (therapeutic purgation) by ayurveda physicians. However, no stability profiles of this formulation are available till date. Considering this, an attempt has been made to evaluate shelf life of TA with the help of modern analytical techniques.[7]

Materials and methods

2.

Collection of raw materials

2.1

All the herbal drugs, Madhu (honey) and Khandaśarkarā (sugar candy) were procured from the Pharmacy, IPGT & RA, Jamnagar. All the herbal drugs were authenticated in the Pharmacognosy Laboratory, IPGT & RA, Jamnagar. Composition formulation is placed at Table 1.

Pharmaceutical preparation of formulation

2.2

Avaleha is prepared by following classical guidelines of Avaleha.[8]

Shelf life evaluation

2.3

Sample quantity and packing

2.3.1

Samples were supplied in four transparent airtight food grade plastic containers plastic bottles with transparent screw cap. Each bottle contains 100 grams of TA.

Storage conditions

2.3.2

Accelerated stability study was conducted as per International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Guidelines Q1A (R2).[1] Samples were stored at 40±2°C and Relative Humidity 75±5%.

Frequency of withdrawal

2.3.3

The products were withdrawn from the container and analyzed initially and at a gap of 1, 3 and 6 months.

Parameters

2.4

Basic analytical parameters including moisture %, ash value and water soluble extractive[9] were evaluated at intervals specified earlier. Test for microbial contamination was done initially and at the end of six months of storage by following standard guidelines.[9] Chromatographic profiles (HPTLC) were evaluated under 254, 366 and 540 nm initially and after six months of storage. Accurately weighed 5g of sample was individually soaked in 10 ml methanol on a Vortex for 10 min, heated for 10 min, filtered through Whatman filter paper no. 1 and then concentrate it on water bath up to 2ml. Drying Mode, Temp. & Time: TLC Plate Heater Preheated at 100± 5°C for 3 minutes; Application Mode: CAMAG Linomat 5 - Applicator; Filtering System: Whatman filter paper No.1; Stationary Phase: MERCK - TLC / HPTLC Silica gel 60 F254 on Aluminum sheets; Application (X axis) Start Position: 10mm; Development (Y axis) End Position: 90mm from plate base; Space Between Band: 10mm; Sample Application Volume: 06μL; Development Mode: CAMAG TLC Twin Trough Chamber; Chamber Saturation Time: 30 minutes; Mobile Phase (MP): Toluene: Ethyl acetate: Formic acid (7:3:0.1); Visualization: @254nm, @ 366nm and @ 540 nm (after derivatization); Spray reagent: Anisaldehyde Sulphuric acid reagent; Derivatization mode: CAMAG - Dip tank for about 1 minute[10].

Results and discussion

3.

The organoleptic characters of the TA are shown in Table 2. No changes in organoleptic characters were found in the formulation at different levels of storage. Physico-chemical characters of TA at initial, 1, 3, 6months interval are shown in Table 2. Microbial growth was found below prescribed limits[9] by the end of 6thmonths (Table 3). Heavy metals were also found to be within the permissible limits at the end of 6th months[9] (Table 4). HPTLC showed 2spots at 254 nm, 4 spots at 366 nm and 4 spots at 540 nm (Figure 1). Rf values recorded were same for both samples (0, 6 months) (Table 5).

No changes in organoleptic characters were found at different levels of storage. TA was found to be brownish black in color with characteristic odor and taste. Color of drug was due to its components. Insignificant differences were observed in basic physico-chemical profiles in the drugs at different stages of analysis. Physicochemical standards such as total ash value and water soluble extractive value are useful in identification and authentication of the plant material. The total ash is particularly important in the evaluation of purity of drugs, i.e. the presence or absence of inorganic matter and also helps in determining both physiological ash and non-physiological ash. Extractive values help in determining the amount of active constituents and is done on plant materials in particular solvent for which as yet no suitable chemical or biological assay exists.[11] Presence of more moisture content in a sample can create preservation problem. The moisture content was found to be increasing gradually with storage. Microbial count and Heavy metals were within the permissible limits indicating safety and quality of the product.

Table 1.

Formulation composition of Trivrit Avaleha

DrugLatin namePart usedRatioQuantity
TrivitOperculina turpenthum Linn.Dried Root25 parts6.25 kg
Tamāla patraCinnamomum tamala T. Nees.Dried Leaves1 part250 g
TvakCinnamomum zeylanicum Blume.Dried Bark1 part250 g
ElaElettaria cadamomum Maton.Dried Fruit1 part250 g
MadhuHoney-5 parts1.25 kg
KhandasharkaraSugar candy-10 parts2.5 kg
Table 2.

Organoleptic and physico chemical parameters of Trivrit Avaleha

Organoleptic parameters
Initial1st month3rd month6th month
TasteCharacteristicCharacteristicCharacteristicCharacteristic
ColorBrownish blackBrownish blackBrownish blackBrownish black
OdorCharacteristicCharacteristicCharacteristicCharacteristic
ConsistencySemi-solidSemi-solidSemi-solidSemi-solid
Physico chemical parameters
Moisture content(%W/W)10.9610.5612.2016.66
Total Ash (%W/W)1.020.970.950.96
Water Soluble Extractive (%W/W)74.6773.6877.2569.31
Table 3.

Total microbial growth in Trivrit Avaleha

OrganismInitial6 monthsPermissible Limits
Total plate count (cfu/g)<10 cfu/g<10 cfu/g105/g
Total Yeast and Mould CountAbAb103/g
E. coliAbAbAbsent
Pseudomonas aeruginosaAbAbAbsent
Staphylococcus aureusAbAbAbsent
Salmonella entericAbAbAbsent

[i] cfu: Colony Forming Units, Ab: Absent, g: Grams

Table 4.

Heavy metals in Trivrit Avaleha

Heavy metalsTAPermissible limits
Lead2.647ppm10 ppm
CadmiumND0.30 ppm
Arsenic0.425 ppm3 ppm
MercuryND1 ppm

[i] ppm: parts per million, ND: Not Detected

Table 5.

Rf values for methanolic extract of Trivrit Avaleha

DrugSpotRf at 254 nmRf at 366 nmRf at 540 nm
Track1 (0 month)Track2 (6 month)Track1 (0 month)Track2 (6 month)Track1 (0 month)Track2 (6 month)
TA10.480.480.100.100.100.10
20.550.550.480.480.550.55
30.550.550.640.64
40.770.770.770.77
Table 6.

Intercept and slope of Trivrit Avaleha for different parameters

ParametersInterceptSlope
Loss on Drying10.0631.010
Water Soluble Extractive75.630.76
Ash Value0.9950.0081
Figure 1.

Comparative HPTLC of methanolic extract of Trivrit Avaleha

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/jams/JAyuMedSci-2-230-g001.jpg

Solvent System - Toluene: Ethyl acetate: Formic acid (7:3:0.1)

Table 7.

Approximate period (in month) for 10% degradation of Trivrit Avaleha

ParametersInitial10% DegradationApproximate Months required for 10% degradation
Loss on drying10.949.8460.21
Water soluble extractive74.6767.20311.09
Ash Value1.020.9189.5
Mean months6.93333
Table 8.

Extrapolation of Shelf life

DrugMean Months for 10% degradationMultiplication FactorMonthsShelf life Years
Trivrit Avaleha6.933333.3323.0881 year 11 months

[i] Rajput et al. J Ayu Med Sci 2017; Jul-Sep 2(3): 230-3

Shelf life of Avaleha according to classical texts varies from 6 to 12 months, while Rule 161-B of Drugs and Cosmetics Act mentioned it as three years.[12] In current study; Shelf life of TA is found to be 1 year and 11 months. Earlier study, Shirishāvaleha showed 2 years 6 months (with Kanji) and 1 year 4 months (with water),[13] Kamsaharitaki Avaleha[14] showed 1 year 6 months, Shirishashwagandhadi Avaleha[15] showed 8 years 7 months. Findings of earlier studies make corroborate to results of TA except Shirishashwagandhādi Avaleha that is found more stable, possibly due to the presence of metallic components in that. This indicates that the shelf life of Avalehas with metallic composition will be comparatively higher than the ones with pure herbal part (Table 6 to 8).

Conclusion

4.

On extrapolation of the observations the Shelf life of TA is found to be 1 year and 11 months. Findings of earlier studies are in support of current observations. Similar RF values obtained in HPTLC analysis of TA initially and after six months showed minimum deterioration of the product. Studies involving other Avalehas are needed to substantiate the observations of the current study. The current work is preliminary in nature involving a few parameters. Extensive studies may be taken-up to revalidate current observations.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Authors are sincerely thankful to the management of Vasu Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., for the state of the art testing facility to carry out this work.

Notes

[4] Conflicts of interest SOURCE OF SUPPORT

IPGT&RA, Gujarat Ayurved University, Jamnagar, India.

Notes

[5] Conflicts of interest CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

There are no conflicts of interest.

CONTRIBUTORS

Dr. Shivshankar contributed to design, literature study and data acquisition. Dr. Shweta contributed to the conceptualization of the topic, data analysis and manuscript editing. Dr. Galib contributed to the manuscript review, intellectual content, design and literature study. Dr. Dei contributed to the manuscript review and analysis of study.

REFERENCES

1. 

International Conference on Harmonisation Expert Working Group , author. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and ProductsQ1A (R2). 2003 Feb 6. European Union, Japan and USA: Available from: www.ich.org. Accessed April 7, 2017.

2. 

Martin Alfred N , author. Martin’s Physical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. Sinko Patrick J , editor. Role: EditorsChemical Kinetics and Stability; China: 2005. p. 4

3. 

Acharya YT , author. Role: editor5th ed. Commentary Ayurveda dipika of Chakarpanidatta on Charaka Samhita of Agnivesha, Sidhdhisthana; Vamanvirechana Vyapatsidhdhi: Chapter 6, Verse 16. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Samskrit Sansthan; 2001. p. 704

4. 

Vidhyasagar PS , author. Role: editorCommentary Jivanprada of Dr. Shilaja Shrivastava on Sharangadhara Samhita. Poorva Khanda, Paribhashakathanam: Chapter 1, Verse 51. Varanasi: Choukhambha Orientalia Publication; 2002. p. 13

5. 

Shastri L , author. Role: editor1st ed. Yoga Ratnakara, Purvadha, Jwarachikitsa, Athaushadhagrahanavichara; Verse 4. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Sanskrita Samsthana; 2005. p. 203

6. 

Gupta Kaviraja Atrideva , author. Role: editorCommentary Vidhyotini on Astanga Hridayam, Kalpasthana; Chapter 2, Verse 9-10. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Samskrita Samsthana; 2005. p. 509

7. 

Sunil Kumar KN, Priyadarshini Pushpendra, Holla BS, Ravishankar B, Yashovarma B , authors. Pharmacopoeial constants as indication of stability of polyherbal formulations - a study on Hutabhugadi and Sitopaladi Curna of Ayurvedic Formulary of India. J Sci Inno Res. 2015;4(3):124–6

8. 

Shivshankar Rajput, Shweta Mata, Dei LP, Harisha CR, Shukla VJ , authors. Evaluation of Trivrit Avaleha with reference to pharmacognostical & physico-chemical characteristics. Global J Res Med Plants & Indigen Med. 2016;5(8):226–34

9. 

The Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India , author. 1st. Govt. of India: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Part II. I. 2007. Appendix-2, (2.2.10); p. 140–63

10. 

Kumar Koppala Narayana Sunil, Priyadarshini, Ravishankar Basaviah, ashovarma Betkeri , authors. Quality standards for Bhunimbadi Kvatha Churna. J Ayu Med Sci. 2016;1(1):19–33. DOI:10.5530/jams.2016.1.4.

11. 

Nasreen S, Radha R, Jayashree N, Selvaraj B, Rajendran A , authors. Assessment of quality of Tinospora cordifolia (Willd.) Miers. (Menispermaceae): Pharmacognostical and phyto-physicochemical profile. International Journal of Comprehensive Pharmacy. 2010;5(03)

12. 

The Gazette of India , author. Extraordinary Part-II, Section 3, Subsection (i), No. 482. New Delhi: 2005

13. 

Kaur H, Ruknuddin G, Prajapati PK , authors. Shelf life evaluation of Shirishavaleha: A preliminary study. BLDE Univ J Health Sci. 2016;1:120–4. Available from: http://www.bldeujournalhs.in/text.asp?2016/1/2/120/196099.

14. 

Khemuka N, Galib R, Patgiri BJ, Prajapati PK , authors. Shelf-life evaluation of Kamsa haritaki avaleha and its granules: A preliminary study. Ancient Sci Life. 2015;35(2):96–100

15. 

Dave Parth B, Vaghela DB, Galib, Jadav Hasmukh R , authors. Shelf Life Assessment of Shirisha Ashwagandhadi Avaleha - A Preliminary Assessment. Journal of Medical Pharmaceutical and Allied Sciences. 2016;5(11):302–13