Gamma Glutamyl Transferase Levels In Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study

Jyoti, Nitin, Shashank, and Pradeep: Gamma Glutamyl Transferase Levels In Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study

Authors

INTRODUCTION

Several mechanisms are known to regulate the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and oxidative stress is one of them.1,2 Several studies demonstrated that an elevated serum GGT activity can be used as a marker for increased oxidative stress in humans.3,4 GGT is pro-inflammatory and its activity has been observed in coronary atherosclerotic plaques containing oxidized LDL.5,6 High levels of serum GGT have been shown to be associated with the development of CAD risk factors such as diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension and metabolic syndrome.710 The marked relation between GGT and atherosclerotic process has shifted attention to the principal issue of whether its serum levels can aid in the detection of individuals at higher risk of incident cardiovascular events.11

Previous studies showed that measurement of GGT activity may be useful in predicting cardiovascular risk as GGT levels were higher in patients of coronary artery disease than in patients who had insignificant coronary artery disease or normal coronaries.1214 Some Indian studies have reported that ACS patients had significantly higher levels of serum GGT as compared to controls and there was significant association with the established risk factors like abnormal body mass index (BMI), hypertriglyceridemia, DM and systolic and diastolic hypertension. In an observational study, increased GGT levels were associated with absence of coronary collateral vessels in patients with ACS.12 In a Turkish study, GGT levels were higher in STEMI and NSTEMI than UA group which proposes a relationship of GGT and severity of ACS. In more severe ACS with higher degrees of inflammation, GGT levels are found to be consistently higher.15

Although the relationship between GGT and CAD has been reported, there is very limited data exploring the changes of GGT in ACS from central India. Hence the present study was conducted to assess the prevalence of raised GGT and its correlates in ACS patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective, single centre, observational cross-sectional study was conducted during a 24 months period, between November 2012 till October 2014 in the intensive coronary unit of the Department of Medicine, in a 650-bedded teaching tertiary care teaching hospital from central India (Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram). Approximately 450,000 patient visits and about 10,000 patients are admitted to the Medicine wards every year. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences. We obtained a written informed consent from all study subjects before enrolling them in the study.

All consecutive patients of more than 18 years of age, admitted to the Medicine intensive coronary unit during study period, diagnosed to have ACS (index cases) were recruited for the study. Acute coronary syndrome including STEMI, NSTEMI and UA was diagnosed on a clinical basis involving relevant history, biochemical tests and ECG recording. STEMI was defined as ST-elevation of ≥0.1mV in >1 limb leads or ≥0.2 mV in contiguous chest leads or left bundle branch block on presentation to the hospital. Those without ST elevations were diagnosed either with UA or NSTEMI differentiated by the presence of cardiac enzymes. NSTEMI were defined as those having persistent or transient ST segment depression or T wave inversion, flat T waves, pseudo-normalization of T waves or no ECG changes at presentation with raised cardiac enzymes however those without raised cardiac enzymes were defined as UA.16

Patients with past history of myocardial infarction, coronary intervention, congestive heart failure, history of alcoholic liver disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, recent alcohol intake i.e., less than 3 weeks, respiratory failure, renal failure, on antiepileptic drugs (phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital), on oral contraceptives and not provided written informed consent were excluded from the study.

All study subjects included in the study underwent a relevant clinical history and physical examination. Demographic data including age and sex; BMI, information about major risk factors for coronary artery disease coronary artery disease like DM, hypertension, alcohol consumption and smoking was sought in all cases. BMI reference value according to World health organization was defined as normal (18.5 - 24.9 kg/m2), underweight (< 18.5 kg/m2), overweight and obese (≥25Kg/m2). Diabetes mellitus was defined as a fasting blood glucose level >126 mg/ dL or using anti diabetic drugs and hypertension was defined as blood pressure of 150/90 mmHg or more or taking antihypertensive medications. Subjects were considered as smokers if they reported smoking for at least 3 months in their life and who currently smoke at least on some days of a week.

Blood samples were obtained in fasting state in order to measure blood sugar, lipid levels (TG, total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and VLDL) and GGT. All the study subjects were informed previously to remain fasting at-least 10 hours before the blood samples were withdrawn. Creatine kinase – MB (CK-MB) and creatinine were performed on admission in all study subjects. Blood samples were collected in plain tubes and serum free from hemolysis was stored at 2 – 8°C. Serum GGT levels were measured at 37°C by enzymatic calorimetric test using a reagent L-gammaglutamyl-3-carboxy-4-nitroanilide by Auto-analyzer. For the study purpose serum GGT levels of > 32 IU/L in females and > 50 IU/L in males were considered raised.17

Statistical analysis: We used STATA software (Version 16, Stata Corporation, Texas, USA) to analyze the data. GGT was assessed for normal distribution. Since it was not normally distributed in our study, we used median and interquartile range to describe GGT. Magnitude of raised GGT in ACS was expressed in percentage. Unadjusted odds ratio (ORs) and multivariate logistic regression analysis along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed to assess the strength of association between independent variables (age, sex, BMI, smoking, DM, hypertension, CK - MB, lipid profile, and diagnosis of ACS and dependent variables (raised GGT levels). P ≤ 0.05 was considered as significant. To derive full model multi- colinearity was assessed by tolerance. Tolerance of 0.1 or less was taken as an indicator of multi – colinearity. We dropped TG, LDL and VLDL from multivariate model to improve the tolerance.

RESULTS

A total of 626 patients presented with ACS during study period, out of which 215 had past history of ACS. Out of 411 new cases presenting with ACS, 88 subjects were excluded based on exclusion criteria and 323 subjects were included in the study (177-STEMI, 82-NSTEMI and 64-UA) as shown in Figure 1.

The baseline characteristics of the study subjects are summarized in Table 1. The study subject’s age at the time of presentation varied from 26-86 years with a mean age of 58±12 years, and majority (58.80%) of study subjects belonged to 35-60 years of age. Majority (67.50%) of study subjects were male. Normal BMI was found in 66.25% study subjects with overweight and obese constituting 31.27%. History of smoking was found in 38.39% subjects, 14.24% were diabetics and 20.12% subjects were hypertensives.CK-MB was found to be raised in 79.75% subjects. Raised levels of serum cholesterol (9.58%), TG (25.23%), LDL (13.41%) and VLDL (26.51%) were found in study subjects respectively. Low levels of HDL were found in 87.85% subjects.

The magnitude of raised GGT among ACS was 41.80%. Median and interquartile range of serum GGT levels in STEMI, NSTEMI and UA were 39 (30-54) U/L, 45(28-76) U/L and 31(20.5-47.5) U/L respectively. (Figure 2)

On univariate analysis odds of raised GGT were not statistically significant for age, BMI, smoking, DM, hypertension, CK – MB and lipid profile. Odds of raised serum TG [OR: 1.4 (95% CI: 0.84-2.34) P=0.200], raised serum VLDL [OR: 1.42 (0.85-2.36) (P=0.174)] and low serum HDL [OR: 1.38(0.68-2.82) (P= 0.372)] were not significant correlates of raised GGT. Odds of raised GGT were [OR: 2.73 (95% CI: 1.39-5.47) (P=0.003)] times high among NSTEMI compared to UA and increase in odds of raised GGT was statistically significant. However odds of raised GGT were [OR: 1.25 (0.68-2.31) (P= 0.473)] times in subjects with STEMI compared to UA and increase in odds was not statistically significant.

Final model derived by multivariate logistic regression suggested that the significant correlate of raised GGT were male sex [OR: 3.58 (95% CI: 1.88- 6.79) P=0.000] and NSTEMI as diagnosis of ACS [OR: 3.32 (95% CI: 1.51- 7.30) P=0.003] in the study subjects. (Table 1)

DISCUSSION

In this hospital based cross sectional study, from central rural India, we found the magnitude of raised GGT among subjects of ACS to be 41.80%. Table 2 shows results of previous studies.11151823 The differences in the prevalence could be due to different age groups, sample size, study design, reference range of GGT and difference in geographical area and subgroups of ACS.

Figure 1

Flow diagram showing enrollment of study subjects.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/jcdr/JCardiovascRes.8.121-g001.jpg
Figure 2

Box and whisker graph showing GGT by type of acute coronary syndrome.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/jcdr/JCardiovascRes.8.121-g002.jpg
Table 1

Correlates of raised GGT on Univariate and Multivariate analysis. (N=323)

Correlates of GGTTotal No.(%)Raised GGT No.(%)Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
   OR (95% CI)P valueOR (95% CI)P value
Age in years*  0.99 (0.97-1.01)0.2580.99 (0.98- 1.02)0.811
Sex
Males218(67.50)76 (34.86) 0.00023.58(1.88- 6.79)0.000
Females105(32.50)59 (56.19)2.39(1.49-3.86)   
   1   
Body mass index (Kg/m2)
Underweight (<18.5)8(2.48)4(50.00)1.38 (0.30-6.25)0.6550.58(0.08- 4.01)0.580
Normal (18.5-24.9)214(66.25)90(42.06)1   
Overweight and Obese (≥25)101(31.27)41(40.59)0.94 (0.58-1.52)0.8061.05 (0.62- 1.76)0.866
Smoking
Smokers124(38.39)49(39.5)10.5120.67(0.37- 1.20)0.179
Non smokers199(61.61)86(43.2)0.86 (0.54-1.35)    
Diabetes mellitus
Present46(14.24)20(43.48)1.08 (0.58-2.03)0.8030.84(0.41- 1.69)0.621
Absent277(85.76)115(41.52)1   
Hypertension
Present65(20.12)39(60.00)0.98 (0.60-1.60)0.9421.21 (0.70- 2.07)0.498
Absent256(79.26)96(37.50)1   
Creatine kinase − MB (N=321)
Raised256(79.75)112(43.75)1.52 (0.86-2.69)0.1480.75 (0.39-1.45)0.396
Normal65(20.25)22(33.85)1   
Lipid profile (N= 313)
Total Cholesterol (Raised)30(9.58)13(43.33)1.12(0.52-2.42)0.7580.79 (0.34- 1.90)0.610
Triglycerides (Raised) #79(25.23) 42(13.41) 83(26.51) 275(87.85)37(46.84)1.4 (0.84-2.34)0.200  
LDL (Raised) #13(30.95)0.61 (0.31-1.23)0.167  
VLDL (Raised) #39(46.99)1.42(0.85-2.36)0.174  
HDL (Low) 115(41.82)1.38(0.68-2.82)0.3720.88 (0.39- 1.94)0.745
Diagnosis
STEMI177(54.79)67(37.85)1.25(0.68-2.31)0.4731.53 (0.75- 3.11) 
NSTEMI82(25.39)47(57.32)2.73 (1.39-5.47)0.0033.32 (1.51- 7.30)0.240
Unstable angina64(19.81)21(32.81)1  0.003

Results of few studies showed significant correlation of raised GGT with increasing age in contrast to our study results.18,17 Statistically significant association of raised GGT in male patients with ACS in comparison to female patients was found, which were similar as reported by Puukka et al.24 Possible explanation for higher values in males could be higher prevalence of risk factors like smoking and alcohol in men and seminal vesicles as an extra source of GGT production in men. In our study, the association of raised GGT with increasing BMI was not statistically significant which was similar to a study conducted by Emiroglu.19 Results of studies conducted by Puukka et al,24 and Ruttman et al20 were in contrast to our study where significant association was found with BMI.

In earlier studies, it was found that increased GGT was associated with DM7,81020,2125 in contrast to our study results. In our study, significant association of GGT was not found in subjects with raised TG, cholesterol, LDL and low HDL levels, however this, which was in contrast to various studies.20,21,22 In present study, subjects with NSTEMI had higher prevalence of raised GGT, compared to subjects with STEMI and UA, however this association was not statistically significant. Similar results were obtained by Turkish study done by Emiroglu.19

Major strengths of this study are adequate sample size, use of the standardized protocol and being the only study on association of GGT with ACS in central India specially referring to a rural population. Few studies reported that significant stenosis on coronary angiography; major adverse cardiac events (cardiovascular mortality) were independently associated with raised GGT level.1423 This cross sectional study lacked the follow up analysis of cardiovascular event and mortality. Coronary angiography to prove the diagnosis of ACS could not be performed due to non-availability. We measured GGT levels only at presentation; therefore we have no data whether coronary revascularization and/or medical treatment can alter GGT levels. Lastly, this study was done on Indian population, so the results may not be applicable to other populations of different ethnicity. Alcohol consumption could be a confounding factor as reliability and validity of self -reported alcohol consumption is often questionable.

Table 2

Magnitude of raised GGT in acute coronary syndromes reported in different studies

Sr.NoFirst authorYearCountryStudy typeSample sizeACS subgroupAge (years) sexPrevalence/ Magnitude
1.Present study2014IndiaObservational323STEMI NSTEMI UA≥18 Both41.80%
2.Desai et al222014IndiaCase control100MI30 – 60 BothCases 32±12.07 Controls 15±3 p<0.001
3.Chakraborty et al182014IndiaCase control120MI UA42 – 59 BothMI - 42±5.7, UA - 46±7.6, Control - 25±2.4 (p<0.05)
4.Mao et al232014ChinaCross sectional513 56+/−9.2 BothSingle vessel disease − 23 IU/L Triple vessel disease − 30 IU/L (p=0.003)
5.Dogan et al152012TurkeyCase control237NSTEMI and UA≤25 BothMedian GGT Cases - 32 U/l,Controls - 16 U/l. (p=0.001)
6.Shabbir et al212011PakistanCross sectional218 ≤45 Both(p=0.01)
7.Emigrolu et al192010TurkeyCase control219 58±13 BothSTEMI 64±40, NSTEMI 64±43 UA 34±20, Control 23±10 (p=0.001)
8.Demircan et al112009TurkeyCase control235 60.1±10.5 BothCases 40.2±32.5 Control 29.1±18.3 (p<0.002)
9.Ruttman et al202005AustraliaCohort163944 ≥19 Both21.9% in men 15.6% in women (P=0.001)

(# ST elevated myocardial infarction, ¤non ST elevated myocardial infarction, Ӫ unstable angina, * myocardial infarction)

CONCLUSION

Our study concluded that GGT activity is increased in subjects with ACS. High levels of serum GGT on admission were associated with the burden of atherosclerosis in patients with ACS. As serum GGT is a cost effective and simple vascular risk marker, its routine measurement on admission may be helpful in determining high risk patients of ACS in clinical practice. Further studies with larger numbers of patients will provide more informative data on this subject.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Thanks to all who participated in this study.

Notes

[1] Conflicts of interest CONFLICTING INTEREST Nil

ABBREVIATION USED

ACS

Acute coronary syndrome

BMI

Body mass index

CAD

Coronary artery disease

CIs

Confidence intervals

CK

Creatine kinase

DM

Diabetes mellitus

ECG

Electrocardiogram

GGT

Gamma glutamyltransferase

HDL

High density lipoprotein cholesterol

LDL

Low density lipoprotein cholesterol

MI

Myocardial infarction

NSTEMI

Non ST elevated myocardial infarction

ORs

Odds ratio

STEMI

ST elevated myocardial infarction

TG

Triglycerides

UA

Unstable angina

VLDL

Very low density lipoprotein cholesterol

REFERENCE

1. 

Uçar H, Gür M, Güzükara MY, Kalkan GY, Baykan AO, Türkoğlu C, K, et al. , authors. Gamma glutamyl transferase activity is Independently associated with oxidative stress rather than SYNTAX score. Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. 2015;75(1):7–12

2. 

Roberts CK, Barnard RJ, Sindhu RK, Jurczak M, Ehdaie A, Vaziri ND , authors. Oxidative stress and dysregulation of NAD (P) H oxidase and antioxidant enzymes in diet-induced metabolic syndrome. Metabolism. 2006;55(7):928–34

3. 

Bo S, Gambino R, Durazzo M, Guidi S, Tiozzo E, Ghione F, et al. , authors. Associations between γ-glutamyl transferase, metabolic abnormalities and inflammation in healthy subjects from a population-based cohort: a possible implication for oxidative stress. World journal of gastroenterology. 2005;11(45):7109

4. 

Emdin M, Pompella A, Paolicchi A , authors. Gamma-glutamyltransferase, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular disease.: triggering oxidative stress within the plaque. Circulation. 2005;112:2078–80

5. 

Paolicchi A, Emdin M, Ghliozeni E, Ciancia E, Passino C, Popoff G, et al. , authors. Human atherosclerotic plaques contain gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase enzyme activity. Circulation. 2004;109(11):1440

6. 

Elsurer R, Afsar B , authors. Morning blood pressure surge is associated with serum gamma-glutamyltransferase activity in essential hypertensive patients. Journal of human hypertension. 2015;29(5):331

7. 

Lee DH, Ha MH, Kim JH, Christiani DC, Gross MD, Steffes M, et al. , authors. Gamma-glutamyltransferase and diabetes—a 4 year follow-up study. Diabetologia. 2003;46(3):359–64

8. 

Lee DH, Jacobs DR, Gross M, Kiefe CI, Roseman J, Lewis CE, et al. , authors. γ-Glutamyltransferase is a predictor of incident diabetes and hypertension: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Clinical chemistry. 2003;49(8):1358–66

9. 

Rantala AO, Lilja M, Kauma H, Savolainen MJ, Reunanen A, Kesäniemi YA , authors. Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase and the metabolic syndrome. Journal of internal medicine. 2000;248(3):230–8

10. 

Sluik D, Beulens J W, Weikert C, Van D. S, Spijkerman A. M, Vand A. D. L, et al. , authors. Gamma-glutamyltransferase, cardiovascular disease and mortality in individuals with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012;28(3):284–8

11. 

Demircan S, Yazici M, Durna K, Kilicaslan F, Demir S, Pinar M, et al. , authors. The Importance of Gamma-Glutamyltransferase Activity in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease. Clinical cardiology. 2009;32(4):220–5

12. 

Duran M, Günebakmaz Ö, Uysal OK, Çelik A, Yarlioglues M, Karakaya E, et al. , authors. Increased gamma-glutamyl transferase level is associated with absence of coronary collateral vessels in patients with acute coronary syndrome: an observational study/Akut koroner sendromlu hastalarda artmis gamma-glutamyl transferase seviyesi koroner kollateral damar yoklugu ile iliskilidir: Gözlemsel bir çalisma. Anadulu Kardiyoloji Dergisi: AKD. 2012;12(8):652

13. 

Koza Y, Simsek Z, Tas M. H , authors. Serum gamma-glutamyltransferase and the burden of atherosclerosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2013;41(5):461

14. 

Ulus T, Yildirir A, Sade LE, Temiz A, Polat E, Bozbas H, et al. , authors. Serum gamma-glutamyl transferase activity: new high-risk criteria in acute coronary syndrome patients? Coronary artery disease. 2008;19(7):489–95

15. 

Dogan A, Icli A, Aksoy F, Varol E, Erdogan D, Ozaydin M, et al. , authors. Gamma-glutamyltransferase in acute coronary syndrome patients without ST elevation and its association with stenotic lesion and cardiac events. Coronary artery disease. 2012;23(1):39–44

16. 

O’Gara P. T, Kushner F. G, Ascheim D. D, Casey D. E Jr, Chung M. K, de L. J. A , authors. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:e78–140

17. 

Iqbal A, Khoja A, Iftikhar U, Mehjabeen , authors. A comparison of the effects of Gamma Glutamyltransferase on age and obesity among normal, hypertensive and type 2 diabetics. Biomedica. 2009;25:123–7

18. 

Chakraborty S, Majumder B, Das R, Mondal P, Chatterjee S , authors. Assessment of γ-GT functions as novel risk factor in patients suffering from angina, myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure. Journal of Indian College of Cardiology. 2014;4(4):199–202

19. 

Emiroglu MY, Esen ÖB, Bulut M, Karapinar H, Kaya Z, Akcakoyun M, et al. , authors. Gamma glutamyltransferase levels and its association with high sensitive C-reactive protein in patients with acute coronary syndromes. North American journal of medical sciences. 2010;2(7):306–10

20. 

Ruttmann E, Brant LJ, Concin H, Diem G, Rapp K, Ulmer H , authors. γ-Glutamyltransferase as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease mortality. Circulation. 2005;112(14):2130–7

21. 

Shabbir S, Khan DA, Khan FA, Elahi MM, Matata BM , authors. Serum gamma glutamyl transferase: a novel biomarker for screening of premature coronary artery disease. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. 2011;12(6):367–74

22. 

Desai GM, R. R, Dharapur MS, Merchant R, Khandre R , authors. Role of gamma-glutamyl transferase in evolution of coronary artery disease. International journal of current research and academic review. 2014;2:187–9

23. 

Mao Y, Qi X, Xu W, Song H, Xu M, Ma W, Zhou L , authors. Serum gamma-glutamyl transferase: a novel biomarker for coronary artery disease. Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research. 2014;20:706

24. 

Puukka K, Hietala J, Koivisto H, Anttila P, Bloigu R, Niemelä O , authors. Additive effects of moderate drinking and obesity on serum γ-glutamyl transferase activity. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2006;83(6):1351–4

25. 

Emiroglu MY, Esen ÖB, Bulut M, Karapinar H, Kaya Z, Akcakoyun M, et al. , authors. GGT levels in type II diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome (does diabetes have any effect on GGT levels in acute coronary syndrome?). Acta diabetologica. 2013;50(1):21–5