Composition and Antibacterial Activity of Hydro-Alcohol and Aqueous Extracts Obtained from the Lamiaceae Family

Btissam, Fatima, Kamal, Hassane, and Mohamed: Composition and Antibacterial Activity of Hydro-Alcohol and Aqueous Extracts Obtained from the Lamiaceae Family

Authors

INTRODUCTION

Several aromatic and medicinal plants have been known to synthesize active secondary metabolites, that serve in plant defense mechanisms against microorganisms and contribute to quality and nutritional value and in providing health-beneficial effects,1 and have been known to bear antioxidant.2 This has formed the basis for their applications in some pharmaceuticals, alternative medicines and natural therapies.3,4 Plants from Lamiaceae family are well-known medicinal herbs that are widely used in pharmaceutical products and traditional medicine for the treatment of several pathologies.5,6,7,8 However, their protective power against some strains of bacteria has not been deeply described. For further identification of substances with antimicrobial properties and streamlining their use, we evaluated in the present study the antibacterial activity of nine Moroccan plants from the Lamiaceae family against various bacterial species, with special attention to common germs food toxic-infections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals

All reagents (PCA, MH, Agarose, Resazurin, Ethanol, Folin–Ciocalteau reagent, Folin–Denis reagentsodium carbonate, Gallic acid, potassium acetate, Aluminum trichloride, Quercetin), unless otherwise stated, were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA).

Plant collection and extract preparation

Plants were collected in March, May and Jun 2015 from different region of Morocco (Table 1). The selected parts were dried at 40°C for 15 h. All samples were then ground into a fine powder that was passed through an 80-mesh sieve. Aqueous extracts were obtained by extraction of samples (30 g) with distilled water (300 ml), for 60 min at 80°C (HAE) or 24 h min at 25°C (CAE). Hydro-alcohol extracts were obtained by extraction of samples (20 g) with 200 ml of ethanol solution (70%) for 24 h. The extractions were performed three times. After evaporation, the extracts obtained were autoclaved at 121°C for 15 min and stored at 4°C away from light until use. The extracts yield was determined by the following formula:9

R=(Px/Py)*100R: Extract yield (%), Px: Extract weight (g), Py: Plant weight (g).

Qualitative analysis of phytochemicals

Different groups of secondary metabolites such as aldehydes, terpenoids, polyphenols including flavonoids and tannins, alkaloids, saponins and quinone substances were investigated as used by Parekh J. et al., (2007).10

Quantification of polyphenols and flavonoids
Determination of Total Phenolic Contents (TPC)

The TPC was determined by Folin-Ciocalteu method.11 Briefly, 100 μl of extracts (1 mg/ml) were added to 500 μl of 1:10 Folin–Ciocalteau reagent. After 4 min, 400 μl of sodium carbonate 7.5% (m/v: 75 mg/ml) were added. The absorbance at 765 nm was measured after 30 min of incubation by spectrophotometer type VARIAN Cary 50 UV/Vis. The standard range was prepared from a solution of Gallic acid (GA) (5 mg/ml) with concentrations ranging from 0 to 150 μg/ml. Results were reported in Gallic Acids Equivalents (GAE) per g of sample.

Determination of Total Flavonoid Contents (TFC)

The TFC was determined by aluminum trichloride colorimetric method (AlCl3),12 with modifications. Briefly, 250 μl of extracts (2 mg/ml) were added to 1.4 ml of deionized water, 50 μl of potassium acetate (1 M), 50 μl of aluminum trichloride 10% (m/v), and 750 μl of absolute ethanol. Absorbance at 415 nm was measured (VARIAN Cary 50 UV-Vis) after 30 min of incubation. The standard range was prepared from a solution of Quercetin (10 mg/ml of ethanol 80%), with concentrations ranging from 0 to 150 μg/ml. Results were reported in Quercetin Equivalents (QE) per g of sample.

Determination of Total Tannins Contents (TTC)

The TTC was determined by Folin-Denis method,13 with modifications. Briefly, 100 μl of extracts (1 mg/ml) were added to 500 μl of 1:10 Folin–Denis reagent. After 5 min, 400 μl of Na2 CO3 7.5% (m/v) were added. After 30 min of incubation, absorbance at 760 nm was measured (VARIAN Cary 50 UV-Vis). The standard range was prepared from a solution of Tannic acid (TA) (10 mg/ml) with concentrations ranging from 0 to 150 μg/ml. Results were reported in Tannic Acids Equivalents (TAE) per g of sample.

Evaluation of antibacterial activity

Antibacterial activity was evaluated at Laboratory of Microbiology of hygiene and food safety department of the Institute Pasteur Tangier – Morocco.

Microbial strains and growth conditions

Six different reference strains and food-borne isolates were used for assessing the plant antimicrobial properties; including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (Table 2). Fresh cultures were prepared by transferring a loop of cells from the agar slant to a test tube containing 5 ml of brain heart infusion (BHI) (BioRad) and then incubated overnight at 37°C.

Disk diffusion assay

Disc-diffusion assay was used to determine growth inhibition caused by plant extracts.14 For each strain, inoculums (106–108 CFU per milliliter), was spread on Mueller–Hinton Agar (MHA) (Bio Rad). Enumeration of bacteria was performed by measuring turbidity at 550 nm (VARIAN Cary 50 UV-Vis). Sterile Whitman’s filter discs (N°40; Ø =6 mm), impregnated with 10 μl of different extracts dilutions from the initial concentration of 50 mg/ml, were deposited on the surface of each petri dish. In parallel, an empty disc and an antibiotic disc were used as a negative and positive control respectively. The petri dishes were kept at 4°C for 15 to 20 min to allow the diffusion of the extract, then incubated at 37°C for 18 to 24h, under normal atmosphere, after which, inhibition zones around each disc (> 6 mm) were measured (disc diameter included). Each test was performed in triplicate.

Determination of the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ethanol extracts was determined by the method of Mann and Markham, (1998),15 using resazurin as viability indicator. Different dilutions of the extracts (50; 25; 12.5; 6.25; 3.12; 1.56; 0.8; 0.4; 0.2 and 0.1 mg/ml) were prepared from a stock solution (100 mg/ml). To each well containing 50 μl of the mixture, was added 50 μl of the bacterial suspension (106 to 108 CFU/ml) prepared in Mueller-Hinton Broth medium (MHB). Plate was then incubated at 37°C for 18 to 20h. After the first incubation step, 5 μl of resazurin (1 mg/ml) was added to each well. Reading results was carried out after further incubation for 2 h at 37°C. The MIC corresponds to the lowest extract concentration, which does not produce change of resazurin staining. Then, the optical density at 550 nm was measured (Epoch BioTek UV-Vis) for IC50 determination. The following formula was used to calculate the survival germs percentage:15

S=[(dfdi)/(DfDi)]×100

S: survival percentage of germs, di: densimat value of experimental tube before incubation, Di: densimat value control tube before incubation, Df: densimat value after incubation control tube, df: densimat value of experimental tube after incubation.

Table 1

Plants description

Botanical nameCommon nameGenreOriginPart usedHarvest periodWild / Cultivated plant
Calamintha officinalisMantaCalaminthaMarrakech MayWild
Lavandula dentataKhzama BeldiaLavandulaMarrakech MarchWild
Mentha pulegiumFlioMenthaMarrakech MarchWild
Mentha routundifoliaMarcetaMenthaMarrakech MarchWild
Origanum compactum. BenthZaâtarOriganumMarrakechLeavesMarchWild
Origanum majoranaMerdeddouchOriganumTangier MarchCultivated
Rosmarinus officinalis. LAzirRosmarinusMarrakech JunWild
Salvia officinalis. LSalmiaSalviaMarrakech MarchCultivated
Thymus satureioidesZâitraThymusMarrakech MarchWild
Table 2

Used bacteria

GramStrains
PositiveStaphylococcus aureus 25923
Listeria monocytogenes 4032
Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579
NegativeEscherichia coli ATCC 25929
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 195
Salmonella enterica

Determination of the Minimal Bactericidal
Concentration (MBC)

Plate counting agar (PCA) (BioRad) was seeded with 10 μl of samples from plate wells where there was no resazurin color change. Dishes were then incubated for 18 to 20 hats 37°C. The MBC corresponds to the lowest extract concentration that gives no growth. Moreover, the ratio MBC/CMI of each sample was calculated to assess the antibacterial power.

Statistical Analysis

All in vitro experiments were conducted in triplicate and results were expressed as mean ± SD. Analysis of variance was performed by uni-varied ANOVA for determination of phenolic, flavonoid and tannin contents. Statistical analysis of the antibacterial activity was performed by analysis of variance with two factors in the software SPSS 22 Fr. IC50 value were determined by regression analysis. The values p ≤0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Detection of chemical groups

The chemical groups screening showed that the distribution of secondary metabolites differs between species. From a chemical point of view, we noted the presence of essential oils, saponins, iridoïds, alkaloids, anthocyanins, and aldehydes (Table 3).

In general, the low alkaloids content that are known for their toxicity especially in purified state, may justify the low toxicity of these plants. Alkaloids play an important role in biological structures; they are also powerful anti-cholinergic,16 and well known for their high antibacterial power.17 Pharmacological activities have been reported about saponins such as antibiotic, antifungal, antiviral, hepatoprotective anti-inflammatory and anti-ulcer.18,19 While for essential oils, their presence is equated with a bacteriostatic effect, though some of their chemical constituents seem to have bactericidal properties.20-26 In general, the harvest area and other parameters as the pH and its richness in organic matter, influence greatly the production of alkaloids and other chemical compounds in the plant.21

Total Phenolic, Flavonoid and Tannin Contents

These assays were performed to characterize the ethanol extracts (EE) from our samples. The choice of these substances was due to the fact that polyphenols, such as tannins and flavonoids as epigallocatechin, catechin, myricetin, quercetin21 and luteolin22 are important antibacterial substances.

Ethanol extracts of the Lamiaceae family plants were rich in polyphenols, with average values of flavonoids, and relatively poor in condensed tannins (Table 4). These results support partly those of the literature. However, there was a difference in levels reported by some authors that were very low compared to our results.

This difference was probably due to the difference of the standard used, and the fact that many compounds can react with the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent.27 The phenolic content of a plant depends also on many intrinsic and extrinsic factors.28 In general, flavonoids are plant nutrients that when consumed in the form of fruits and vegetables are non-toxic as well as potentially beneficial to the human body. Tannins are basically used for the treatment of inflammation, leucorrhoea, gonorrhea, burn, piles, diarrhea and antidote in the treatment of alkaloidal poisoning.29 Despite the observed difference between these plants, the Lamiaceae family remains one of the richest families on polyphenols and flavonoids.30

Table 3

Qualitative detection of chemical groups

PlantsAlkaloidsLeucoantho-cyaninsIrridoidsSaponinsAnthraquinoneAnthocyaninsDeoxyosesAldehydesEssential oils
C. officinalis+-+++---+++
L. dentata+-++---+-
M. pulegium+-++---+++
M. rotundifolia+++++-+-+-
O. compactum.+-+--+--++
O. majorana+-+++-+-+++
R. officinalis. L+-+++-++++++
S. officinalis. L+-+++-++++++
T. satureioides+-+++---++++
Total (N)919805287
Total (%)10011.110088.9055.522.288.977.8

(-): Negative test; (+): Positive test

Table 4

Polyphenols and flavonoids content of ethanol extracts and their correspondence in literature

PlantsPolyphenols (mg AG/g Ms)Flavonoids (mg Qu/g Ms)Total tannins (mg AT/g Ms)Correspondence in literature

Polyphenols (mg AG/g Ms)Flavonoids (mg Qu/g Ms)Reference
C. officinalis176.68±0.4583.11±0.741.80±0.0011---
L. dentata145.61±0.8574.65±0.9519.41±0.004---
M. pulegium160.58±0.4580±0.6542.43±0.49206.58± 4.5477.12± 2.9323
M. rotundifolia162.06±0.3568.77±0.8526.18±0.0724.6 ± 0.13.3 ± 0.124
O. compactum.178.12±0.5589.14±0.9845.93±0.27259.12±1.74109.56±2.68
O. majorana170.14±0.2470.21±0.6450.22±0.144.65±1-25
R. officinalis. L148.87±0.4592.78±0.7829.78±0.19190-
S. officinalis. L162.23±0.3698.66±0.6530.02±0.0255.8±1-
T. satureioides167.70±0.1982±0.7437.71±0.18475.00 ± 8.30
456.73±6.94
182.79 ± 3.23
172.79±2.12
26

Antibacterial activity

Measure of the ethanol extracts pH showed values between 5.47 and 6.67 (n = 3). The normal pH of MH medium according to the manufacturer is 6.6 ± 0.2. These values were close statistically (p> 0.05). Therefore, addition of ethanol extracts does not alter significantly the pH of the MHB medium. For evaluation of antimicrobial potential of these extracts, we preferred to use multiple targets that have, each of them, a particular cell structures and metabolism. Results of antibacterial power against these strains helped to plot the sensitivity curves and determine the different antimicrobial parameters (IC50, MIC and MBC) (Table 5). Results obtained by disk diffusion assay were expressed as mean ± SD. Antibacterial activity was estimated according to the inhibition zone diameter (D) generated by the extract.31

By disk diffusion assay, it appears that inhibition diameters varied depending on the ethanol extract used and the bacterial strain tested. Thus, an extract was considered active if it produces an inhibition diameter superior or equal to 15 mm.31 In another study, an inhibition zone superior or equal to 10 mm sufficient to determine the effectiveness of a sample.32 Thus, only O. majorana and R. officinalis followed by S. officinalis and T. satureioides were active.

In liquid medium, the action of the extracts tested was directly bactericidal for certain bacteria strains (MBC = MIC and MBC/MIC = 1). For others, the MBC value was twice that MIC (Table 5). For both Gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, the microplate dilution method was more reliable than solid medium.

The comparison of numerical values of our results with other publications was often qualitative, because authors express their results with different units, in μl/ml.33 in % (v/v)34 or in mg/ml,35 which makes quantitative comparison of these results difficult. Qualitatively, our results were correlated with those of the literature. In general, the EEs of all plants were found to be active against all strains tested. The lower antibacterial parameters values were obtained with L. monocytogenes; therefore, it was the most sensitive strain. Whereas, S. aureus 25923 and P. aeruginosa 195 were the most resistant strains with high MICs and IC50 values, which was consistent with the study of Sqalli et al., 200736 on six Lamiaceae family plants. Intermediate values were recorded for E. coli and B. cereus.

We also noted that the activity report MBC/MIC for P. aeruginosa 195 was still > 2, except for O. majorana and T. satureioides. Therefore, these extracts were the only ones to have a bactericidal effect in liquid medium against all tested strains and especially against P. aeruginosa.

By tukey test, we noticed that there was a significant difference between the IC50 of the nine plants (table 6). The plants groups with the same letters did not differ significantly. In addition, by this test, it seems that the specie with the best antibacterial power was O. majorana, while the lower effect was attributed to L. dentata. For a threshold α = 5%, Fisher’s table provides high critical values. This means that the significant difference between IC50 mean depended on the plant species used.

The difference between the effects of these extracts, was probably due to differences in the chemical composition, the nature and composition of the microorganisms tested membrane32 and the influence of the medium. In addition, the results were affected by the method used to evaluate the antibacterial activity. Indeed, Fazeli et al. (2007)37 founded that the diffusion method from wells on agar was more suitable for studying the activity of aqueous and organic extracts than the disc agar diffusion method.

To study the response of the bacterial strains to other types of extracts, especially aqueous one, a comparative study was conducted on the basis of IC50; plants that showed the highest antibacterial potency were selected for this purpose.

Results indicated that EE of O. majorana was the most active on the six strains followed by CAE, while HAE showed the higher IC50 (Table 7 and figure 1). This was in agreement with results of O. Ertürk (2006)38 which showed that the ethanol extract of cumin was active against E. coli ATCC and P. aeruginosa 195, compared to the hydro-methanol crude extract. However, a different result was obtained for T. satureioides.

These results indicate that the antibacterial activity depends on the extraction method, the solvent used for extraction, but also on the phytochemical composition of each extract.37-39 Thermo ability of active compounds can also explain the result of O. majorana. In fact, during high-temperature treatments, the phenolic structure of polyphenols can be degraded. In addition, thermal processes may lead to the formation of o-quinone and o-semiquinones, very reactive molecules that can react with nucleophilic groups of proteins and / or polysaccharides.40 A recent study shows good stability of polyphenols and flavonoids in the plant matrix during high-temperature treatments commonly applied in food. The degradation kinetics observed were slow in comparison with the duration of the extraction.41

Table 5

The antimicrobial activity parameters

PlantsBacterial strainØ of zone inhibition (mm) for 10 μl extract (50 mg/ml)Qualitative decisionMIC (mg/ml)MBC (mg/ml)Report CMB/MICDecision
C. officinalisE. coli6No inhibitory251004Bacteriostatic
S. aureus6No inhibitory12.512.51Bactericidal
L. monocytogenes6No inhibitory25251Bactericidal
P. aeruginosa6No inhibitory50>100>2Bacteriostatic
B. cereus8±0.13*No inhibitory6.256.251Bactericidal
S. enterica6No inhibitory50>100>2Bacteriostatic
L. dentataE. coli6No inhibitory12.5252Bactericidal
S. aureus6No inhibitory12.5504Bacteriostatic
L. monocytogenes6No inhibitory12.5504Bacteriostatic
P. aeruginosa6No inhibitory251004Bacteriostatic
B. cereus6No inhibitory25251Bactericidal
S. enterica6No inhibitory50>100>2Bacteriostatic
M. pulegiumE. coli9.3±0.21*No inhibitory25502Bactericidal
S. aureus6No inhibitory25251Bactericidal
L. monocytogenes6No inhibitory6.256.251Bactericidal
P. aeruginosa6No inhibitory100>100>1Bacteriostatic
B. cereus9±0.22*No inhibitory3.126.252Bactericidal
S. enterica6No inhibitory25251Bactericidal
O. compactumE. coli13±0.17*Slight inhibitory251004Bacteriostatic
S. aureus6No inhibitory12.5252Bactericidal
L. monocytogenes6No inhibitory3.126.252Bactericidal
P. aeruginosa6No inhibitory25>100>4Bacteriostatic
B. cereus6No inhibitory6.2512.52Bactericidal
S. enterica6No inhibitory12.5504Bacteriostatic
M. rotundifoliaE. coli6No inhibitory251004Bacteriostatic
S. aureus6No inhibitory25251Bactericidal
L. monocytogenes6No inhibitory25502Bactericidal
P. aeruginosa8±0.11*No inhibitory25>100>4Bacteriostatic
B. cereus7±0.5*No inhibitory25251Bactericidal
S. enterica6No inhibitory25251Bactericidal
S. officinalisE. coli6No inhibitory501002Bactericidal
S. aureus16.3±0.057**High inhibitory1.563.122Bactericidal
L. monocytogenes17±0.28*High inhibitory3.126.252Bactericidal
P. aeruginosa6No inhibitory25>100>4Bacteriostatic
B. cereus13±0.11*Slight inhibitory1.563.122Bactericidal
S. enterica11±0.51Slight inhibitory25502Bactericidal
T. satureioidesE. coli6No inhibitory25502Bactericidal
S. aureus6No inhibitory6.2512.52Bactericidal
L. monocytogenes8.1±0.31*No inhibitory6.2512.52Bactericidal
P. aeruginosa10±0.043*No inhibitory25502Bactericidal
B. cereus13.2±0.23*Slight inhibitory<0.512Bactericidal
S. enterica6No inhibitory12.5252Bactericidal
O. majoranaE. coli17±0.1**Moderate inhibitory25502Bactericidal
S. aureus15.3±0.1*Slight inhibitory1.563.122Bactericidal
L. monocytogenes22.3±0.09**High inhibitory3.123.121Bactericidal
P. aeruginosa15.2±0.065**Slight inhibitory25502Bactericidal
B. cereus13±0.15*Slight inhibitory3.123.121Bactericidal
S. enterica12±0.22*Slight inhibitory12.5252Bactericidal
R. officinalisE. coli10.6±0.11*Slight inhibitory501002Bactericidal
S. aureus8.3±0.057*No inhibitory12.5504Bacteriostatic
L. monocytogenes10.2±0.06**No inhibitory6.2512.52Bactericidal
P. aeruginosa8±0.19*No inhibitory50>100>2Bacteriostatic
B. cereus12.2±0.09**Slight inhibitory25502Bactericidal
S. enterica10.2±0.09**Slight inhibitory25502Bactericidal
Table 6

Comparative study of antibacterial effect of nine species EE from the Lamiaceae family.

 IC50 mean ± Er.Std (mg/ml)

P. aeruginosaE. coliS. aureusS. entericaB. cereusL. monocytogenes
C. officinalis12,313±0,20 (b)20,896±0,28 (e)31,421±0,28 (c)20,928±0,38 (d)7,405±0,14 (c)8,666±0,11 (c)
L. dentata86,933±0,22 (g)61,453±0,23 (f)41,482±0,23 (e)53,932±0,48 (e)10,441±0,17 (d)21,222±0,24 (g)
M. pulegium12,405±0,15 (b)11,411±0,28 (c)54,222±0,24 (f)16,17±0,21 (c)17,37±0,25 (g)13,296±0,22 (e)
M. rotundifolia20,33±0,66 (d)12,358±0,36 (c)86,48±0,14 (g)21,306±0,30 (d)36,443±0,25 (h)17,531±0,23 (f)
O. compactum81,556±0,26 (f)18,046±0,23 (d)95,466±0,15 (h)22,142±0,44 (d)13,202±0,31 (e)10,697±0,24 (d)
O. majorana6,546±0,24 (a)1,892±0,27 (a)13,506±0,44 (a)10,484±0,30 (a)1,3487±0,08 (a)1,327±0,13 (a)
R. officinalis22,652±0,24 (e)18,3±0,95 (d)31,769±0,26 (c)17,375±0,28 (c)6,683±0,32 (c)3,445±0,20 (b)
S. officinalis17,373±0,15 (c)8,395±0,24 (b)34,421±0,15 (d)14,469±0,20 (b)14,265±0,17 (f)8,13±0,25 (c)
T. satureioides16,519±0,21 (c)11,752±0,24 (c)28,752±0,26 (b)9,305±0,18 (a)2,467±0,10 (b)8,698±0,26 (c)
TOTAL52,947±22,318,278±1,7246,391±2,7520,679±1,3312,180±1,0510,334±0,63
FISHER20562,56 (p<0,000) **1749,44 (p<0,000) **11190,43 (p<0,000) **1631,67 (p<0,000) **2298,84 (p<0,000) **823,09 (p<0,000) **

Groups with the same letters do not differ significantly by tukey test. Er.Std: standard error

** Very highly significant difference.

Based on IC50 of T. satureioides extract, the effectiveness ratios IC50-EE/ IC50-HAE for the six strains were between 1 and 4, while IC50-CAE/ IC 50HAE varied between 2 and 8; this means that in the case of T. satureioides, HAE was active respectively until 4 to 8 times more than EE and CAE. For O. majorana extract, IC50-HAE/ IC50-EE varied between 1 and 135, and IC50-CAE/ IC50-EE were between 2 and 224. Thus, the EE had activity respectively 135 and 224 times more than the HAE and CAE. Results of Mohsen and Ammar (2009)42 showed that ethanol was the best solvent for phenolic compounds extraction, followed by methanol and finally water. This could explain the difference mentioned below. The active compounds were soluble in ethanol but also in water and their activity does not disappear after treatment of the extract 15 min at 100°C.

The different values obtained allowed to plot the sensitivity curves of each strain for the nine-ethanol extracts (Figure 2). In general, this sensitivity was reflected by a decrease of the overall appearance of all the sensitivity curves. Therefore, there was a significant progressive decrease in the number of germs colonies. Curves were canceled between 20 and 40 mg/ml for E. coli 25922 and S. enterica, between 20 and 50 mg/ml for S. aureus 25923 and P. aeruginosa 195, and between 10 and 30 mg/ml for L. monocytogenes 4032 and B. cereus 14579. The negative correlation between the extract concentration and survival of the six bacterial strains indicated that these ethanol extracts were active in different degrees with a dose-response relationship (Figure 2).

According to these curves and figure 3, it seems that the most resistant strain was S. aureus and P. aeruginosa, followed by E. coli 195 and S. enterica. Whereas, L. monocytogenes and B. cereus showed a remarkable sensitivity towards the majority of extracts.

The high standard error recorded in the case of P. aeruginosa indicated that, from a plant to another, there was a significant difference in the survival of this strain (Figure 3). Which means that this biological activity was not due to an active principle present in all the Lamiaceae family plants, but rather to one or several specific compounds present in each species. While the response of the other strains was almost the same regardless of the plant used. A highly significant difference (p <0.000) was found by comparing the IC50 of the six bacterial strains paired two by two (Table 8).

Table 7

Comparison of the antimicrobial activity of ethanol and aqueous extracts of O. majorana and T. satureioides

PlantBacterial strainIC50 (mg/ml)IC50EE /IC50HAEIC50CAE /IC50HAEIC50CAE /IC50EEIC50HAE /IC50EE

EEHAECAE
T. satureioidesE. coli11.88±0.711.82±0.4178.11±1.601.086.6--
S. aureus28.66±0.756.69±0.5511.26±0.464.281.68--
L. monocytogenes8.27±0.0243.88±0.1524.62±0.402.136.34--
P. aeruginosa16.37±0.854.26±0.3733.63±0.863.847.89--
B. cereus2.35±0.123.8±0.414.93±0.0720.611.29--
S. enterica9.1±0.8611.76±0.797.64±0.690.770.64
O. majoranaE. coli1.13±0.07253.14±3.11152.48±2.27--224.01134.93
S. aureus13.96±0.3513.99±0.973.68±0.20--1.560.41
L. monocytogenes1.18±0.2126.57±0.5721.54±0.42--22.5118.25
P. aeruginosa6.13±0.9636.33±0.5222.5±0.64--5.923.67
B. cereus1.13±0.1230.7±0.2520.34±1--27.1618
S. enterica10.55±0.7911.94±0.616.60±0.55--1.571.13

EE: Ethanol Extract; HAE: Aqueous extract at 80°C; CAE: Aqueous extract at 25°C.

Figure 1

Comparison of the IC50 of ethanol and aqueous extracts of T. satureioides (a) and O. majorana (b). EE: Ethanol Extract; EAC: Aqueous extract at 80°C; EAF: Aqueous extract at 25°C.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-10-81-g001.jpg

The hypersensitivity of L. monocytogenes and B. cereus can be explained by the sensibility of Gram (+) to the external environmental changes (temperature, pH, and natural extracts…), due to the absence of the outer membrane.43 While, even if S. aureus is a Gram (+), it showed some resistance to the extracts tested. Some studies have not revealed selective antimicrobial activity towards the Gram (+) and Gram (-).44 The resistance of S. aureus can be attributed to the ability of the antibacterial agent to diffuse uniformly in the agar45 while for P. aeruginosa, resistance can be assigned to its outer membrane composed of lipopolysaccharides, which form an impermeable barrier to hydrophobic compounds.46

Figure 2

Effect of ethanol extracts on the in vitro growth of E. coli (a), S. aureus (b), L. monocytogenes (c), P. aeruginosa (d), B. cereus (e), S. enterica (f).

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-10-81-g002.jpg
Figure 3

The IC50 means representation of ethanol extracts of the Lamiaceae family plants for the six strains studied.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-10-81-g003.jpg
Table 8

Comparison of means two by two of the ethanol extracts effect of the different bacterial strains by the student test

Paired samplesT studentSignifiance
P. aeruginosaE. coli5,88p<0,000 **
S. aureus5,25p<0,000 **
S. enterica4,55p<0,000 **
B. cereus5,79p<0,000 **
L. monocytogenes7,35p<0,000 **
E. coliS. aureus8,88p<0,000 **
S. enterica4,15p<0,000 **
B. cereus2,97p<0,004 **
L. monocytogenes5,74p<0,000 **
S. aureusS. enterica9,1p<0,000 **
B. cereus16,32p<0,000 **
L. monocytogenes14,58p<0,000 **
S. entericaB. cereus5,39p<0,000 **
L. monocytogenes10,74p<0,000 **
B. cereusL. monocytogenes2,2p<0,03 *
Figure 4

Projection of different variables of the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) on the factorial graph.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-10-81-g004.jpg

To facilitate the analysis of various factors and detect correlation and all independence relationships between different variables, we conducted a principal component analysis (PCA) (Figure 4). Thus, the projections of PCA variables on a factorial graph was obtained, with a graphical representation of the active species. In this projection, we noted the presence of two groups: Gram - were correlated on axis 1, whereas Gram + were correlated on axis 2.

Concerning the distribution of plants, it was found that R. officinalis and C. officinalis were negatively correlated with Gram +. While, O. majorana, T. satureioides, S. officinalis, M. pulegium and M. rotundifolia were negatively correlated with Gram -, which means that when the concentration of plant extract increased, the percentage of survival decreased. Origanum compactum and L. dentata had the least efficient antibacterial effect against all strains studied.

The method used to evaluate the antibacterial activity also affected the results. Fazeli et al., (2007)47 founded that the diffusion method from wells on agar was more suitable for studying the activity of aqueous, organic and hydro-ethanolic plant extracts than the agar diffusion method. In addition, the effect of a plant substance depends on several factors including the mode of extraction and concentration of active compound.47 According to the study of Bagre, 2007,48 some chemical groups are eliminated and others are concentrated during the liquid-liquid extraction. Thus, the alkaloids and sterols that were less concentrated in the aqueous total extract were strongly present in the acetate extract while the concentration of flavonoids remained regardless of the solvent used.

Polyphenols, such as tannins and flavonoids as epigallocatechin, catechin, myricetin, quercetin49 and luteolin22 are highly active antimicrobial agents. Another study on 10 methanolic extracts from the Lamiaceae family showed that the rosmarinic acid turned out to be the most predominant phenolic compound in all the examined plant organs, and may be considered as the chemotaxonomic marker of this family. This compound is known as an antiviral, antibacterial, antioxidant agent.50 Extracts of L. dentata, M. pulegium and M. rotundifolia contained an appreciable amount of polyphenols but they showed a weak inhibitory activity against the different studied strains probably because their activity is concealed by the presence of sugars.51,52

For the six tested strains, there was no correlation between the phenolic and flavonoid contents of the nine plants and their antibacterial activities (0.0014 ≥ R2 ≥ 0.134), indicating that these compounds were not responsible for the observed antibacterial activity. Similar results (R2 = 0.00) were obtained by Turkmen et al., (2007)53 in the evaluation of the antibacterial activity of tea extracts. The same result was found for the EBr of cumin with R2 = 0.323.54 Several studies have shown that a relationship exists between the antioxidant activity and the antibacterial extracts of MAPs,55 which may in part be responsible for the activity obtained in this study. However, the antibacterial activity of extracts with low antioxidant activity and low levels of polyphenols and flavonoids was probably related to other bioactive compounds. A phytochemical study on essential oils of O. compactum and R. officinalis, showed that p-Thymol, Eucalyptol and Citronellal were respectively the major components in those investigated plants.56 These compounds are considered to have a high antibacterial action.57 Moreover, the total antimicrobial activity of an extract is not always attributed to the major compounds, but can be due to synergistic57 or antagonistic interactions58 with other minority compounds.

Recent results have shown that saponins were the compounds with the highest antibacterial effect compared to polyphenols and flavonoids.59 The alkaloids, in turn, are known for their high antibacterial power.17 These alkaloids concentrated in our ethanol extracts could be partly responsible for the achieved antibacterial activity. Oxygenated terpenes and especially terpene alcohols are also highly active antimicrobial agents.60

CONCLUSION

Results of this study showed that all the investigated ethanol extracts present antibacterial properties. Bacillus cereus and L. monocytogenes were the most sensitive to the different extracts, with a dose-response relationship. However, the highest activity was recorded in O. majorana followed by T. satureioides. These results were directly related to the quantitative and/or qualitative diversity of the extracts compounds. Generally, the total activity is not only attributed to the major compounds, because the interactions between different compounds can exist synergistically or antagonistically57, 58. This allows understanding and determining the appropriate chemical formulation for the active compound once identified.

This study could contribute to the knowledge of in vitro antimicrobial potential of some plants from the Lamiaceae family, which makes these plants and generally MAPs, an ethnobotanical heritage to be preserved and promoted in order to discover new bioactive molecules. Thus, the results of this work seem to be important from the point of view of additional pharmacological applications of medicinal plants belonging to the Lamiaceae family.

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-10-81-g005.jpg

SUMMARY

  • Ethanol extracts of the Lamiaceae family plants were rich in polyphenols, with middling values of flavonoids, and relatively poor in condensed tannins, with the detection of saponins, essential oils, irridoids, alkaloids, anthocyanins, and aldehydes.

  • The extracts action was directly bactericidal for B. cereus and L. monocytogenes. For P. aeruginosa, the MBC value was twice that MIC.

  • The ethanol extract of O. majorana and T. satureioides showed the highest antibacterial activity against the six strains, with a bactericidal effect.

  • The principal component analysis revealed that R. officinalis and C. officinalis were negatively correlated with Gram positive strains. While, O. majorana, T. satureioides, S. officinalis, M. pulegium and M. rotundifolia were negatively correlated with Gram negative stains.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Dr. Bendahou Abdelrazak (Pasteur Institute of Morocco) for providing Bacillus and Salmonella strains.

ABOUT AUTHORS

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-10-81-g006.jpg

Ramdan Btissam: obtained her Ph. D. degree in 2017 from Faculty of Science and Technology of Tangier (FSTT), University Abdelmalek Essaadi, Morocco. Her doctoral research focused on the evaluation of anti-glycation activity and cytotoxicity of natural products and as well as anti-bacterial activity and its potential in vivo.

Notes

[5] Conflicts of interest CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

ABBREVIATION USED

HAE

Hot aqueous extract

CAE

Cold aqueous extract

EE

Ethanolic extract

REFERENCES

1. 

Doughari JH, El-Mahmood AM, Tyoyina I , authors. Antimicrobial activity of leaf extracts of Senna obtusifolia (L). African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2008;2(1):007–13

2. 

Vardar-Ünlü G, Candan F, Sökmen A, Daferera D, Polissiou M, et al. , authors. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of the essential oil and methanol extracts of Thymus pectinatus Fisch. et Mey. Var. pectinatus (Lamiaceae). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2003;51(1):63–7

3. 

Lis-Balchin M, Deans SG , authors. Bioactivity of selected plant essential oils against Listeria monocytogenes. Journal of applied microbiology. 1997;82(6):759–62

4. 

Rios JL, Recio MC , authors. Medicinal plants and antimicrobial activity. Journal of ethnopharmacology. 2005;100(1):80–4

5. 

Ayadi S, Jerribi C, Abderrabba M , authors. Extraction et étude des huiles essentielles de Rosmarinus Officinalis cueillie dans trois régions différentes de la Tunisie. Journal de la Société Algérienne de Chimie. 2011;21(1):25–33

6. 

Bouhdid S, Skali SN, Idaomar M, Zhiri A, Baudoux D, et al. , authors. Antibacterial and antioxidant activities of Origanum compactum essential oil. African journal of Biotechnology. 2008;7(10)

7. 

Nostro A, Cannatelli MA, Morelli I, Cioni PL, Bader A, et al. , authors. Preservative properties of Calamintha officinalis essential oil with and without EDTA. Letters in applied microbiology. 2002;35(5):385–9

8. 

Panizzi L, Flamini G, Cioni PL, Morelli I , authors. Composition and antimicrobial properties of essential oils of four Mediterranean Lamiaceae. Journal of ethnopharmacology. 1993;39(3):167–70

9. 

Harborne J.B , editor. Phytochemical methods; a guide to modern techniques of plant analysis. Chapman and Hall; London: 1998. p. 40–106

10. 

Parekh J, Jadeja D, Chanda S , authors. Efficacy of aqueous and methanol extracts of some medicinal plants for potential antibacterial activity. Turkish Journal of Biology. 2006;29(4):203–10

11. 

Boizot N, Charpentier J-P , authors. Méthode rapide d’évaluation du contenu en composés phénoliques des organes d’un arbre forestier. Cah. Tech. INRA. N°. spécial. 2006;79–82

12. 

Dehpour AA, Ebrahimzadeh MA, Fazel NS, Mohammad NS , authors. Antioxidant activity of the methanol extract of Ferula assafoetida and its essential oil composition. Grasas y aceites. 2009;60(4):405–12

13. 

Joslyn M.A , author. Methods in food analysis. Physical, chemical and instrumental methods of analysis. 1970;845

14. 

Zhang YW, Dou DQ, Zhang L, Chen YJ, Yao XS , authors. Effects of ginsenosides from Panax ginseng on cell-to-cell communication function mediated by gap junctions. Planta medica. 2001;67(05):417–22

15. 

Mann CM, Markham JL , authors. A new method for determining the minimum inhibitory concentration of essential oils. Journal of applied microbiology. 1998;84(4):538–44

16. 

Zirihi GN, Kra AK, Etien DT , authors. Étude botanique et évaluation des activités antifongiques de Mitracarpus villosus (MV)(Rubiaceae) et Spermacoce verticillata (SV)(Rubiaceae) sur la croissance in vitro de Aspergillus fumigatus. Revue Méd. Pharm. Afr. 2007;20(2007):9–17

17. 

Gnalei R.M , author. Etude tri phytochimique de différentes fractions (extrait total aqueux, extrait éthanolique 70%, fraction F5) de BITTER GG, une substance anti-diarrhéique de source végétale. D.E.A de Biotechnologie, Option Pharmacologie des substances naturelles. Université de Cocody-Abidjan, UFR-Biosciences, Laboratoire de Pharmacodynamie-Biochimique; 2005. p. 33

18. 

Oakenfull DG , author. Aggregation of saponins and bile acids in aqueous solution. Australian journal of chemistry. 1986;39(10):1671–83

19. 

Scazzocchio F, Cometa MF, Tomassini L, Palmery M , authors. Antibacterial activity of Hydrastis canadensis extract and its major isolated alkaloids. Planta medica. 2001;67(06):561–4

20. 

Dorman HJ, Deans SG , authors. Antimicrobial agents from plants: antibacterial activity of plant volatile oils. Journal of applied microbiology. 2000;88(2):308–16

21. 

Demeyer K, Dejaegere R , authors. The effect of total mineral dose and pH on alkaloid accumulation in Datura stramonium L. Journal of herbs, spices and medicinal plants. 1996;3(3):35–44

22. 

Tada Y, Shikishima Y, Takaishi Y, Shibata H, Higuti T, et al. , authors. Coumarins and γ-pyrone derivatives from Prangos pabularia: antibacterial activity and inhibition of cytokine release. Phytochemistry. 2002;59(6):649–54

23. 

Yumrutas O , author. Determination of antioxidant and antimutagenic activities of Phlomis armeniaca and Mentha pulegium. J. App. Pharm. Sci. 2012;2(1):P39

24. 

Fatiha B, Didier H, Naima G, Khodir M, Martin K, et al. , authors. Phenolic composition, in vitro antioxidant effects and tyrosinase inhibitory activity of three Algerian Mentha species: M. spicata (L.), M. pulegium (L.) and M. rotundifolia (L.) Huds (Lamiaceae). Industrial Crops and Products. 2015;74:722–30

25. 

Roby MH, Sarhan MA, Selim KA, Khalel KI , authors. Evaluation of antioxidant activity, total phenols and phenolic compounds in thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.), sage (Salvia officinalis L.), and marjoram (Origanum majorana L.) extracts. Industrial Crops and Products. 2013;43:827–31

26. 

Ramchoun M, Sellam K, Harnafi H, Alem C, Benlyas M, et al. , authors. Investigation of antioxidant and antihemolytic properties of Thymus satureioides collected from Tafilalet Region, south-east of Morocco. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine. 2015;5(2):93–100

27. 

Gómez-Caravaca AM, Gómez-Romero M, Arráez-Román D, Segura-Carretero A, Fernández-Gutiérrez A , authors. Advances in the analysis of phenolic compounds in products derived from bees. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2006;41(4):1220–34

28. 

Tawaha K, Alali FQ, Gharaibeh M, Mohammad M, El-Elimat T , authors. Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of selected Jordanian plant species. Food Chemistry. 2007;104(4):1372–8

29. 

Taiz L, Ziegler E , authors. Plant Physiology. 4th edn. 2006. 13. p. 315–344. Sinauer Associates, Publishers; Massamchusetts: ch.

30. 

Buzzini P, Arapitsas P, Goretti M, Branda E, Turchetti B, et al. , authors. Antimicrobial and antiviral activity of hydrolysable tannins. Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry. 2008;8(12):1179–87

31. 

Mutai C, Vagias C, Abatis D, Roussis V , authors. Antimicrobial activity of Acacia mellifera extracts and lupane triterpenes. J Ethnopharmacol. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2009.02.007

32. 

Rossi JJ, June CH, Kohn DB , authors. Genetic therapies against HIV. Nature biotechnology. 2007;25(12):1444–54

33. 

Biyiti L.F, Meko’o D.J.L, Tamzc V, et al. , authors. Amvam ZPH. Recherche de l’activité antibactérienne de quatre plantes médicinales camerounaises. Pharm. Méd. Trad. Afr. 2004;13:11–20

34. 

De Billerbeck V.G, Roques C, Vanière P, Marquier P , authors. Activité antibactérienne et antifongique de produits à base d’huiles essentielles. Revue hygiène. 2002;10(3):248–54

35. 

Le Bourhis L, Werts C , authors. Role of Nods in bacterial infection. Microbes and infection. 2007;9(5):629–36

36. 

Sqalli H, El Ouarti A, Ennabili A, Ibnsouda S, Farah A, et al. , authors. Evaluation de l’effet antimycobactérien de plantes du centre-nord du Maroc. Bull Soc Pharm. 2007;146:271–88

37. 

Fazeli MR, Amin G, Attari MM, Ashtiani H, Jamalifar H, et al. , authors. Antimicrobial activities of Iranian sumac and avishan-e shirazi (Zataria multiflora) against some food-borne bacteria. Food control. 2007;18(6):646–9

38. 

Ertürk ö , author. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of ethanolic extracts from eleven spice plants. Biologia. 2006;61(3):275–8

39. 

Roldán LP, Díaz GJ, Duringer JM , authors. Composition and antibacterial activity of essential oils obtained from plants of the Lamiaceae family against pathogenic and beneficial bacteria. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias. 2010;23(4):451–61

40. 

O’Connell JE, Fox PF , authors. Proposed mechanism for the effect of polyphenols on the heat stability of milk. International Dairy Journal. 1999;9(8):523–36

41. 

Renard C.M.G.C, Caris-Veyrat C, Dufour C, Le Bourvellec C , authors. Le devenir des polyphénols et caroténoïdes dans les fruits et légumes traités thermiquement. Innov. Agron. 2014;42:125–37

42. 

Mohsen SM, Ammar AS , authors. Total phenolic contents and antioxidant activity of corn tassel extracts. Food chemistry. 2009;112(3):595–8

43. 

Balentine CW, Crandall PG, O’Bryan CA, Duong DQ, Pohlman FW , authors. The pre-and post-grinding application of rosemary and its effects on lipid oxidation and color during storage of ground beef. Meat Science. 2006;73(3):413–21

44. 

GUESMI A, BOUDABOUS A , authors. Activité antimicrobienne de cinq huiles essentielles associées dans les produits de thalassothérapie. Revue des régions arides. 2007;224:30

45. 

Hayouni EA, Abedrabba M, Bouix M, Hamdi M , authors. The effect of solvents and extraction method on the phenolic contents and biological activities in vitro of Tunisian Quercus coccifera L. and Juniperus phoenicea L. fruit extracts. Food Chemistry. 2007;105(3):1126–34

46. 

Mann CM, Cox SD, Markham JL , authors. The outer membrane of Pseudomonas aeruginosa NCTC 6749 contributes to its tolerance to the essential oil of Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree oil). Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2000;30(4):294–7

47. 

Thangaraj HS, Adjei O, Allen BW, Portaels F, Evans MR, et al. , authors. In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin, ofloxacin, amikacin and rifampicin against Ghanaian isolates of Mycobacterium ulcerans. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2000;45(2):231–3

48. 

Bagre I, Bahi C, Gnahoue G, Djaman AJ, Guede GF , authors. Composition phytochimique et évaluation in-vitro de l’activité antifongique des extraits des feuilles de Morinda morindoïdes (baker) Milne-Redhead (Rubiaceae) sur Aspergillus fumigatus et candida albicans. J. sci. pharm. Biol. 2007;8(1):15–23

49. 

Demeyer K, Dejaegere R , authors. Nitrogen and alkaloid accumulation and partitioning in Datura stramonium L. Journal of herbs, spices and medicinal plants. 1998;5(3):15–23

50. 

Simpol LR, Otsuka H, Ohtani K, Kasai R, Yamasaki K , authors. Nitrile glucosides and rosmarinic acid, the histamine inhibitor from Ehretia philippinensis. Phytochemistry. 1994;36(1):91–5

51. 

Sanogo R, Diallo D, Diarra S, Ekoumou C, Bougoudogo D , authors. Activité antibactérienne et antalgique de deux recettes traditionnelles utilisées dans le traitement des infections urinaires et la cystite au Mali. Mali Médical. 2006;21(1):18–24

52. 

Surveswaran S, Cai YZ, Corke H, Sun M , authors. Systematic evaluation of natural phenolic antioxidants from 133 Indian medicinal plants. Food Chemistry. 2007;102(3):938–53

53. 

Turkmen N, Velioglu YS, Sari F, Polat G , authors. Effect of extraction conditions on measured total polyphenol contents and antioxidant and antibacterial activities of black tea. Molecules. 2007;12(3):484–96

54. 

Athamena S, Chalghem I, Kassah-Laouar A, Laroui S, Khebri S , authors. Activité antioxydante et antimicrobienne d’extraits de Cuminum cyminum L. Lebanese Science Journal. 2010;11(1):69–81

55. 

Boulekbache-Makhlouf L, Slimani S, Madani K , authors. Total phenolic content, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of fruits of Eucalyptus globulus cultivated in Algeria. Industrial crops and products. 2013;41:85–9

56. 

Btissam R, Rajae R, Amina A, Brigitte V, Mohamed NH , authors. In vitro study of anti-glycation and radical scavenging activities of the essential oils of three plants from Morocco: Origanum compactum, Rosmarinus officinalis and Pelargonium asperum. Pharmacognosy Journal. 2015;7(2):124–35

57. 

Jiang Y, Wu N, Fu YJ, Wang W, Luo M, et al. , authors. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Rosemary. Environmental toxicology and pharmacology. 2011;32(1):63–8

58. 

Viuda-Martos M, Ruiz-Navajas Y, Fernández-López J, Pérez-álvarez JA , authors. Antibacterial activity of different essential oils obtained from spices widely used in Mediterranean diet. International journal of food science and technology. 2008;43(3):526–31

59. 

Faleiro ML, Miguel MG, Ladeiro F, Venancio F, Tavares R, et al. , authors. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils isolated from Portuguese endemic species of Thymus. Letters in applied microbiology. 2003;36(1):35–40

60. 

Milugo TK, Omosa LK, Ochanda JO, Owuor BO, Wamunyokoli FA, et al. , authors. Antagonistic effect of alkaloids and saponins on bioactivity in the quinine tree (Rauvolfia caffra sond.): further evidence to support biotechnology in traditional medicinal plants. BMC complementary and alternative medicine. 2013;13(1):285