Pharmacognostical Evaluation of Rhododendron arboreum Sm. from Uttarakhand

Tewari, Sah, and Bawari: Pharmacognostical Evaluation of Rhododendron arboreum Sm. from Uttarakhand

Authors

INTRODUCTION

Himalayan region is the treasure of biodiversity and consists of diverse flora and fauna. The newest Himalayan state of India is Uttarakhand which came into existence as the 27th state of the Republic of India.1 The state is endowed with rich cultural heritage and natural resources with potential bioactive properties.

Several less explored plants are available in the Himalayan region. One such plant is Rhododendron arboreum Sm. (family Ericaceae) which is a popular plant especially for its beautiful flower and flower juice which is consumed as a popular beverage in the Himalayan region. The plant is commonly known as “Burans” and “Laligurans ” and is an important contributor to the economy of the rural areas of Uttarakhand. R. arboreum is the national flower of Nepal and state tree of Uttarakhand.2 The plant is supposed to be described in Ayurveda as Kurabaka which is kept in the Kashaya group.3 and sold in the local market of Nepal in the name of “Rohitaka”.2

Different parts of this small tree possess important therapeutic activities. The leaves of this plant showed hepatoprotective effects in rats.4 Apart from the leaves of this plant, other parts like flowers and bark are also used for various therapeutic purposes. The plant contains numerous phytoconstituents like ursolic acid, lupeol, sitosterol, taraxerol and betulin (Figure 1).5

The pharmacognostic evaluation parameters are useful in the identification and standardization of a crude drug.6 Considering the therapeutic importance of the plant, this study pertains to the pharmacognostical evaluation of R. arboreum leaves. To the best of our knowledge, the leaves of R. arboreum from Kumaun region of Uttarakhand were investigated for its morphological and cytological investigation with the help of scanning electron microscopy for the first time.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Plant material

The fresh leaves and flowers of R. arboreum were collected from Ramgarh region of Nainital district, Uttarakhand, India. The herbarium specimens were prepared and authenticated from Regional Ayurveda Research Institute (RARI), Jhansi and the voucher specimen was deposited in the respective Herbarium for future reference (Accession no. 25277).

Organoleptic Evaluation

Organoleptic study of R. arboreum was carried out to evaluate its sensory characters such as colour, odour, taste, shape, size as per the reported method.7,8 The leaves of the plant material were placed separately on a watch glass and observed carefully for their apparent characteristics like general appearance, colour, odour and taste. The observations were recorded as accurately as possible that provided information on obvious physical properties.7,8

Microscopical evaluation

The leaves of the R. arboreum were subjected to microscopical studies. The material was dipped in FAA (Formalin–acetic acid-alcohol) solution.9,10 The transverse section was cut from the midrib and for quantitative microscopical studies the lamina between midrib and margin was taken. Leaves were soaked in 70% v/v ethanol followed by free hand section cutting and then viewed under the microscope. Moreover, quantitative microscopical studies such as determination of stomatal index, vein islet number and veinlet-termination number were also carried out as per the standard protocols.11,12 The material was placed on the slide and stained with different staining reagents and examined under the microscope (Leica DM 2500 LED).12

Scanning electron microscopy

Leaf sample for R. arboreum was subjected to scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with the help of scanning electron microscope. Electron microscope (ZEISS EVO 40 EP) was used and images were analyzed by QUANTAX 200 analytical software. The sample was properly dried with an electric lamp and then separately mounted on stubs using double-sided adhesive tape. After that the samples were sputtercoated with 5 nm cathodic spraying (Polaron gold) using a separate coating machine to make the sample more conductive and suitable for SEM analysis and then observed under the scanning electron microscope (ZEISS EVO 50). SEM was carried out under the following analytical conditions: EHT = 20.00 kV, WD = 9.5 mm and signal A = SE1. The SEM photographs were captured on the Zeiss EVO 50 scanning electron microscope at the required magnification (ranging between 100x to 8000x) at room temperature.13

Physicochemical evaluation

Evaluation of physicochemical parameters viz. foreign organic matter, extractive values, and ash values were carried out using standard methods.14,15

Preliminary phytochemical screening

Different extracts (methanolic, ethyl acetate and petroleum ether) of R. arboreum were subjected to qualitative evaluation for the presence or absence of different groups of phytoconstituents.11,12 such as alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, carbohydrates, glycosides, lipids, phenols and tannins.

Figure 1

Chemical structures of phytoconstituents of Rhododendron arboreum.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-10-527-532_g001.jpg

Fluorescence analysis

Fluorescence analysis is an important qualitative evaluation parameter of herbal drugs that is helpful in the detection of the adulteration in the raw material or finished products. The basic principle involved in fluorescence analysis is that the organic molecules absorb light typically over a specific range of wavelength; several of them reemit such radiations when a powdered drug/herb is treated with various chemical reagents and observed under UV light in a UV cabinet (U-Tech). Varying range of coloured fluorescence produced in short-wavelength (254 nm) and long-wavelength (366 nm) were prudently scrutinized for the detection of fluorescent compounds as per the suggested method.16

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Organoleptic Evaluation

Organoleptic evaluation is an important initial step for the identification of the plant material. R. arboreum was evaluated for its basic botanical and organoleptic characteristics. The plant has dark glossy green, broad leaves with size ranging between 6-20 cm, with a brown coating beneath. The leaves are oblong-lanceolate, 4-6 cm wide, glabrous, white or rusty brown-tomentose beneath. The leaves are present in abundance towards the ends of the branches. Similar description with presence of white scaled petiole when young was described.17 The flowers of R. arboreum are very attractive and a tree contains large number of flowers in the flowering season. Flowers of Rhododendron exhibit coloration ranging from deep scarlet, to red with white markings, pink to white. The plant species collected for the present study had dark red flowers in dense globose cymes as presented in Figure 2 and the details of the organoleptic characters are presented in Table 1. Forests with Rhododendron tree covers are of astonishing sight when in full bloom.

Microscopic evaluation

The transverse section of R. arboreum leaf through midrib depicted a normal dicot leaf. The outer most layer of cuticle was followed by upper epidermis and then collenchyma. Long palisade layer was present. The inner circle consisted of the xylem and phloem cells. Vacuole was also present mainly in the lower epidermis part. The cells of upper epidermis were tightly closed as compared to the lower epidermis. Spongy parenchyma also contained vacuole. Microscopical features of the R. arboreum leaf are presented in Figure 3.

Stomatal index, vein-islet number and veinlet-termination number were determined as a part of quantitative microscopic evaluation. The mean values were calculated from different observations. Measurements of different tissues of leaf and stem were carried out, and the results are presented in Table 2.

Scanning electron microscopy

Use of powerful microscopical tools for the anatomical studies is gaining importance these days. SEM is one of the dominant methods for the surface structure elucidation of the plant based drugs. This technique is proving as one of the most exciting and momentous tool for the study and elevation of surface topography of solids.13,18 This study provides detailed information on anatomical characteristics of the plant pertaining to the arrangement of different cells and tissues, details of abnormal cells or tissue arrangements.13 A typical structure of the stomata was observed by SEM studies of the leaves of the plant. The paracytic stomata were found in cluster form. The epidermal cells were long and spongy. The cells also contained some grooves and papillae throughout the surface. The details of the SEM studies of R. arboreum are presented in Figure 4.

Physicochemical analysis

The physicochemical eavaluation of R. arboreum was carried out and the results are expressed in Table 3.

Preliminary phytochemical screening and fluorescence analysis

The preliminary phytochemical study revealed the presence of different phytoconstituents in different extracts of R. arboreum (Table 4). Highest chemical identities were present in the methanolic and ethyl acetate extracts whereas the petroleum ether extract showed the presence of only lipids and major constituents. The methanolic and ethylacetate extract revealed the presence of alkaloids, tannins, reducing sugar and phenolic compounds. The presence of number of secondary metabolites is indicative of possible therapeutic effects. Observations presented in Table 5 indicate identifiable traits of the plant material tested. Colour variations from pale green to dark green and black were observed on treatment with the mentioned solvents and reagents under day light and UV light (short and long wavelength). Fluorescent study of R. arboreum using different chemical reagents exhibited various colouration under visible light and UV light. UV light induces several fluorescent components in natural products.

Figure 2

Morphological characteristics of R. arboreum (A, B: Flower; C: Tree, D: Reproductive organs of flower).

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-10-527-532_g002.jpg
Table 1

Organoleptic evaluation of the plants.

Organoleptic charectersR. arboreum leafR. arboreum flower/juice
ColourGreenChrimson/amaranth Red
OdourOdourlessSimilar to that of beetroot
TasteBitter/AcridAcrid followed by astringent
ShapeBroadNA
Size6-20 cmNA
FractureFibrousNA
Table 2

Details of quantitative microscopy.

Quantitative microscopyR. arboreum
Stomata index13-15-18
Stomata density180±59
Vein islet number34-42-67
Veinlet termination number32-36-45
Palisade ratio2-4
Palisade layer397.35±29 µm
Xylem vessels148.9±36 µm
Table 3

Physicochemical parameters of the different plant studied.

ParametersR. arboreum leaf
Foreign matterNil
Moisture content0.78%
Total ash1.6%
Acid insoluble ash0.32
Sulphated ash0.0214
Water soluble extractives12%
Alcohol soluble extractives9.65%
Table 4

Details of preliminary phytochemical screening of R. arboreum.

PhytoconstituentsR. arboreum
 
MEEAPE
Carbohydrate++----
Saponins+++++--
Alkaloids++--
Reducing sugar++++-
Lipids----+
Tannins++++-
Phenols++++-

ME: methanolic extract, EA: ethyl acetate extract, PE: petroleum ether extract

Table 5

Fluorescence analysis and reaction with different reagents.

TreatmentRhododendron arboreum (Leaf)Rhododendron arboreum (Juice)
 
Visible/Day lightUV254 nmUV 366 nmVisible/Day lightUV254 nmUV 366 nm
Crude drug as suchGreenish brownDark greenLight greenCrimson RedDark redLight pink
Powder + methanolDark greenLight greenLight greenRedLight pinkLight pink
Powder+ EtherPale yellowPale greenDark greenPinkish redDark redPinkish red
Powder+ ChloroformLight pinkLight pinkLight pinkLight pinkDark greenDark green
Powder+ AcetoneDark greenPale greenDark greenFaint redLight pinkLight pink
Powder +10% NaOHDark greenLight greenLight greenFaint redLight pinkLight pink
Powder + dil. NH3Greenish brownDark greenLight greenPale yellowPale greenPale green
Powder + Conc. HNO3Dark greenGreenish brownLight greenTransparentFaint redDark brown
Powder + 1M H2 SO4Dark greenLight greenLight greenFaint redLight pinkLight pink
Powder+1M HClLight greenDark greenDark greenRedLight pinkLight pink
Powder + 10% FeCl3Dark greenPale greenDark greenPinkish redDark redPinkish red
Powder + 10 % IodineBlueDark greenDark greenLight pinkDark greenDark green
Figure 3

Transverse section of Rhododendron arboreum Sm. leaf (a: dicot leaf; b: palisade layer).

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-10-527-532_g003.jpg
Figure 4

Scanning electron photomicrographs of the leaves of R. arboreum (A, B: Stomata, C, D: Papillae and palisade cells)

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-10-527-532_g004.jpg

Rhododendrons are believed to be amongst the widely grown ornamentals of great horticultural interest. The genus comprises of about 1000 species worldwide.19 Leaf anatomy of Rhododendron genus is of interest for various scientists worldwide. A critical comparison of the leaf structures in two Rhodendron species viz. R. catawbiense and R. ponticum propagated in USA was carried out using scanning electron microscopy. The results of the study indicated that R. ponticum has higher stomatal density than R. catawbiense leaves. The study also demonstrated the thermonasty (i.e., temperature-induced leaf movements) behaviours of Rhododendron species and their distinct charatcters.20

The distribution of the species R. arboreum Sm. is restricted to a small number of South East Asian countries like India, Bhutan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Northern Myanmar, Northern Thailand, South Western China, and Northern Vietnam. Different species of Rhododendron have been extensively studied by Indian researchers but most of the studies were focused on the pollen morphology.21,22 Sufficient studies have not been carried out on the pharmacognostical aspect of R. arboreum leaves. Although, one extensive study was recently carried out by Panda and Kirtania.23 on the leaf anatomy and pollen morphology of R. arboreum based on herbarium and field based exomorphological data to evaluate the intraspecies variations in R. arboreum complex. In the study several leaf samples from Arunachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Meghalaya, Darjeeling, Shilong, Uttaranchal, Bhutan, Nepal, Himachal Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and China were presented and the stomata complex was evaluated on Arunachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Bhutan, Sikkim, China, Kerala, and Tamil Nadu samples.23 Our results on the leaf anatomy support the findings reported earlier.23

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study provide an insight on the pharmacognostical evaluation of the R. arboreum leaves from Uttarakhand region. The details presented in the study confirms the qualitative presence of various secondary metabolites in the leaves and flowers of R. arboreum. Moreover, the data of this study could be useful in the preparation of the pharmacopoeial monograph of R. arboreum. Further phytochemical and pharmacological studies are required to unravel the safety and bioefficacy of R. arboreum.

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-10-527-532_g005.jpg

SUMMARY

  • Rhododendron arboreum Sm. commonly known as Burans is an important plant of the Himalayan region.

  • R. arboreum from Uttarakhand region was investigated for its morphological and cytological characteristics with the help of scanning electron microscopy

  • The results of the present study provide an insight on the pharmacognostical evaluation of the R. arboreum leaves from Uttarakhand region.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We are grateful to Head D.O.P.S. Bhimtal for necessary facilities, Textile Department, Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi (IIT) for providing their SEM facility, In-charge, RARI Jhansi and Dr. Sanjeev Lale for identification of plant, Dr. L. S. Rautela for the technical support.

ABOUT AUTHORS

Dr. Archana Negi Sah: Is a Graduate in Pharmaceutical Sciences and Basic Sciences, Post Graduate in Herbal Drugs Technology and Ph.D. in Pharmacy. She is currently working as Senior Assistant Professor in Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Technology, Kumaun University, Bhimtal Campus Nainital, Uttarakhand India from more than a decade. Dr. Sah is a recipient of the UGC fellowship for the PG course and received first prize for paper presentation. She is supervising 4 Ph.D. Scholars and supervised more than 20 M. Pharm. students in their Research work. Dr. Sah is a member of different Professional and academic bodies, published chapters, peer reviewed national and international papers and delivered a range of presentation in different International and National Seminar/Conferences.

Devesh Tewari: Is a Doctoral student and has submitted his Thesis in the field of Ethnopharmacology and Pharmacognosy in Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Technology, Kumaun University, Bhimtal Campus Nainital, Uttarakhand, India, he is a Master of Pharmacy in Pharmacognosy. He is the author of several publications in various national and international journals and reviewer of various journal of high international repute.

Sweta Bawari: Is a Doctoral student and INSPIRE Fellow at Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Technology, Kumaun University, Bhimtal Campus Nainital, Uttarakhand, India. She has obtained her Master of Pharmacy in Pharmacology. Her area of research is focused on pharmacological activities and evaluation of natural products.

Notes

[2] Conflicts of interest CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors declare no conflict of interest.

ABBREVIATIONS USED

SEM

Scanning electron microscopy

TS

Transverse section

REFERENCES

1. 

Tewari D , author. Ecopharmacognosy: With Special Reference to Indian Himalayan Region. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2014;28(2):147–9

2. 

Keshari P, Pradeep, Prabhu SN , authors. Pharmacognostical and chromatographic evaluation of market sample of Rhododendron arboreum stem bark as a source plant for Rohitaka in Nepal. J of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2017;6(5):296–306

3. 

Singh Thakur Balwant, Chunekar KC , authors. Glossary of vegetable drugs in Brihattrayee. 1st. Varanasi: The Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series; 1972. p. 447–8

4. 

Prakash T, Fadadu SD, Sharma UR , authors. Hepatoprotective activity of leaves of Rhododendron arboreum in CCl4 induced hepatotoxicity in rats. Journal Medicinal Plant Research. 2008;2(11):315–20

5. 

Nisar M, Ali S, Muhammad N, Gillani SN, Shah MR, Khan H, Maione F , authors. Antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory potential of Rhododendron arboreum bark. Toxicol and Industrial Health. 2016;32(7):1254–9

6. 

Tewari D, Kumar P, Sharma P , authors. Pharmacognostical Evaluation of Elaeocarpus sphaericus (Rudraksha) Leaves. Int J Pharmacognosy and Phytochemical Res. 2013;5(3):147–50

7. 

Kokate CK , author. Practical pharmacognosy. Vallabh Prakashan; New Delhi: 1986. 111.

8. 

Khandelwal KR , author. Practical Pharmacognosy. Techniques and experiments. 9th. Nirali prakashan India; 2008

9. 

Johansen DA , author. Plant microtechnique. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc; London: 1940. 530.

10. 

Berlyn GP, Miksche JP, Sass JE , authors. Botanical microtechnique and cytochemistry. Iowa State University Press; 1976

11. 

Trease GE, Evans WC , authors. Pharmacognosy. 12th. Bailliere Tindall, A division of Cassell Ltd.; Eastbourne BN, 2130N: 1983. p. 17–63

12. 

Wallis TE , author. Text book of Pharmacognosy’reprint. CBS Publication; New Dehli: 2005. p. 578–81

13. 

Tewari D, Sah AN, Bawari S, Sharma H, Mangal AK , authors. Pharmacognostical Evaluation and HPTLC Fingerprinting Identification of Ficus palmata Forssk. (Bedu) from Western Himalaya. Curr Bioactive Compounds. 2017;13:DOI: 10.2174/1573407213666170126161111

14. 

Anonymous. Quality Control Methods for Medicinal Plant Materials. World Health Organization (WHO); Geneva: 1998

15. 

Anonymous. Physico-chemical standards of Unani formulations, Part-IV, Central Council for Research in Unani Medicine (CCRUM). Dept. of AYUSH, M/o Health and Family Welfare. Govt. of India; New Delhi: 2006. p. 157–60

16. 

Ramasheshan ST, Pitchaiah P, Maramreddy PR, Bharti V, Ramakrishana KK, Gaddam V, et al. , authors. Pharmacognostical Standardization of Goraksha pods: an important Nutritive and antidiabetic Plant. Pharmacognosy Journal. 2016;8(5)

17. 

Orwa C, Mutua A, Kindt R, Jamnadass R, Simons A , authors. Agroforestree database: a tree species reference and selection guide version 4.0. World Agroforestry Centre ICRAF; Nairobi, KE: 2009

18. 

Haywood VH , author. Scanning electron microscopy in the study of plant materials. Micron. 1969;1(1):1–14

19. 

Chamberlain D, Hyam R, Argent G, Fairweather G, Walter KS , authors. The genus Rhododendron: its classification and synonymy. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh. 1996;

20. 

Wang X, Arora R, Horner HT, Krebs SL , authors. Structural adaptations in overwintering leaves of thermonastic and nonthermonastic Rhododendron species. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 2008;133(6):768–76

21. 

Nair PKK, Kothari S , authors. Pollen morphology of Indian Heteromerae. Adv. Pollen-Spore Res. 1985;13:1–7

22. 

Paria ND, Pal A , authors. Quantitative and experimental studies on pollen morphology of some Indian Rhododendron (Ericaceae). J. Palynol. 1990;26:95–104

23. 

Panda S, Kirtania I , authors. Variation in Rhododendron arboreum Sm. complex (Ericaceae): insights from exomorphology, leaf anatomy and pollen morphology. Modern Phytomorphology. 2016;9:27–49