In vivo Antibacterial Activity of Green Algae Ulva reticulata against Staphylococcus aureus in Drosophila Model of Infection

Nainu, Asri, Arsyad, Manggau, and Amir: In vivo Antibacterial Activity of Green Algae Ulva reticulata against Staphylococcus aureus in Drosophila Model of Infection

Authors

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-10-5-993_g000.jpg

INTRODUCTION

The growing problem of life-threatening infectious diseases caused by the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria have been shown to have an adverse impact on the health of human populations.1-5 To overcome this challenge, the discovery of new antibacterial drugs with a possible novel mechanism of action is urgently required.6,7 Unfortunately, despite the huge effort given by countless research groups and pharmaceutical companies worldwide, the rate of discovery of new effective antibiotics is progressively declining,7-9 which is substantially diminishing our hope of providing a solution to this ever-growing crisis.

One of the reasons for the declining in the rate of antibiotic drug discovery is the high cost of in vivo testing of antibacterial activity using mammalian model systems.10,11 In addition, the impact of ethical issues raised by the use of the traditional established mammalian model of bacterial infection is a challenge when examining the effect of many antibiotic candidates in parallel, thus increasing the assessment period.10 To make things worse, there is no guarantee that the antibiotic candidates with positive results in an in vitro experiment will yield similar results in the trial stage using an in vivo animal model system.7,10 Therefore, there is a high chance that valuable time and costs that have been spent during the discovery process may not bring a profitable outcome.

At present, there is a vast number of original articles reporting the antibacterial activity of crude extracts prepared (or compounds isolated) from a diverse array of natural products,12,13 including Indonesian medicinal plants.14,15 Although most of these extracts and compounds yielded promising results in the in vitro stage, many are not further characterized or even tested in the pre-clinical in vivo stage,12 thus jeopardizing the whole reason for such research to be done in the first place.

To circumvent these money- and time-wasting risks and difficulties, there is a need for an alternative platform to assess the antibacterial activity of drug candidates with low-cost and high-throughput results. Reasoning that some of the above-mentioned obstacles can be overcome by the usage of low-cost live-animal infection model system, we used fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) model of bacterial infection as a platform to screen the antibacterial effect of samples. In these past years, Drosophila melanogaster has been used extensively to uncover important biological pathways,16,17 especially the ones related to immunity against bacteria18,19 and viral infection.20-22 To the latest, D. melanogaster has been recognized as a promising disease model to discover new drug candidates and/or their respected targets.23-25

Drosophila melanogaster have been widely suggested as a suitable host for several pathogenic bacteria known to cause devastating infections in humans such as Staphylococcus aureus,11,26 Pseudomonas aeruginosa,27 Listeria monocytogenes,28 Burkholderia spp.,29 and Bacillus anthracis.30 In addition to that, with its high degree of genetic similarity with human, cheap maintaining costs, and poses almost no ethical issues,10,16,17 D. melanogaster offers great advantages as an in vivo model system in antibacterial drug discovery research. Capitalizing on such advantages, in the current study, we tested the application of Drosophila model of bacterial infection as an in vivo platform to assess the antibacterial effect of Ulva reticulata extract, a particular sample that was shown to have a strong in vitro antibacterial activity against S. aureus in the preliminary in vitro experiment.31,32

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and fly stocks

The S. aureus ATCC 29213 strain was used as the infectious agent. The bacteria were cultured in Nutrient Broth (NB) medium at 37°C, separately. When the cultures reached full growth, it was harvested, washed with PBS, and used in the experiments. The following lines of Drosophila were used in this study: w1118 as genotype (background) control, drprΔ5 clone 15 which has no detectable expression of Draper (a gift from Yoshinobu Nakanishi, Kanazawa University), and Tl[r3] (Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN) with undetected level of Toll, a known receptor that triggers innate immunity of the D. melanogaster. All flies were maintained with standard cornmeal-agar medium at 25˚C.

Sample preparation

Samples of the green alga Ulva reticulata were purchased from Puntondo, Takalar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia and processed as described previously,32 with modifications. Samples were sorted and subjected to maceration procedures using 96% ethanol for 3×24 hours. The resulting extracts were then further processed to reduce the water content and kept in a brown silica container prior to use. The voucher specimen was deposited at Biofarmaka Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hasanuddin University.

Fly infection and assays for survival and bacterial growth

The introduction of bacteria into the thorax of male adult flies, known as pricking, was carried out according to the established procedures33 with modifications. Briefly, at 4–7 days after eclosion, the flies (10 flies per vial, 3 vials in each experiment) were pricked with bacterial suspension containing given numbers of bacteria (1 × 10cfu/ml) per fly. Flies infected with bacteria were maintained at 29°C and subjected to either survival assay or colony forming assay. In the survival assay, fly groups were observed for survival during the course of infection, in the presence or absence of treatments. In the colony forming assay, the growth of bacteria in flies was analyzed by determining the colony-forming activity of injected bacteria as described previously,34 with some modifications. Homogenates of infected flies were plated at serial dilutions on Vogel-Johnson agar medium and the number of colonies that appeared after incubation was expressed as CFU per ml. Groups of healthy flies were also included in both survival and colony forming assays.

Data Processing and Statistical Analysis

Results from quantitative analysis are expressed as the mean ± S.D. of the data from at least three independent experiments, unless otherwise stated in the text. Statistical analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier log-rank analysis (for survival curve) and one-way ANOVA or Student’s t test (for CFU analysis), and p values of less than 0.05 were considered significant and are indicated in the figures. All results were processed using Graph Pad Prism® 7.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Drosophila melanogaster is a suitable model for S. aureus infection

Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive bacterium that have broad negative effects on organisms, including humans. To examine the virulence properties and possible (novel) drug targets available in this bacteria, scientists have tried to cultivate it in different types of hosts, including lower invertebrates such as Drosophila melanogaster.26,27 Here, we used Drosophila melanogaster as an alternative in vivo platform to assess the antibacterial effect of green algae Ulva reticulata on S. aureus. As shown in Figure 1, infection of Drosophila melanogaster w1118 by S. aureus resulted in the decrease of infected flies’ survival rate in a dose-dependent manner. It is apparent that S. aureus was able to propagate in D. melanogaster in vivo, supporting the notion that D. melanogaster can be used to explore aspects related to S. aureus infection, including virulence factors and possible of treatments, as reported by other investigators.26,27,35

Figure 1

Dose-response of S. aureus in the infection experiment. Adult flies w1118 at 4-7 days after eclosion were infected with a range of doses of S. aureus ATCC 29213 by pricking and subjected to fly survival analysis.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-10-5-993_g002.jpg

Improvement of S. aureus-infected Drosophila melanogaster survival rate by either antibiotics or ethanolic extract of Ulva reticulata

A class of drugs that can inhibit the growth of bacteria, known as antibiotics, has been widely introduced as one of the potent arsenals in the treatment of infection in humans. In this experiment, the incorporation of tetracycline, an antibiotic that inhibits protein synthesis in bacteria, into the food of S. aureus-infected Drosophila w1118 was able to prevent the early death of infected host (Figure 2), similar to the ones observed by Needham et al. (2004), suggesting that tetracycline which function well on humans can yield a similar effect in our Drosophila infection model system,. In addition to that, 25 mg/ml ethanolic extract of Ulva reticulata also rescued S. aureus-infected D. melanogaster from early death phenotype that was seen in the untreated control group. This result implicates the in vivo antibacterial of ethanolic extract of Ulva reticulata against S. aureus at the tested concentration.

Figure 2

Survival of infected-w1118 D. melanogaster in the presence or absence of treatments. Adult flies w1118 at 4-7 days after eclosion were infected with 1 x 105 cfu/ml of S. aureus ATCC 29213 by pricking and incubated at 25oC in the presence of 1, 5, or 25 mg/ml of Ulva reticulata extracts then followed by fly survival analysis. Flies treated with tetracycline at 200 µg/ml were used as a positive control group.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-10-5-993_g003.jpg

Inhibition of bacterial growth by antibiotics or extract of Ulva reticulata

Bacterial load has been suggested to play an important role in the increasing death rate of the infected host.26 Since we observed the increasing survivorship of infected flies in the presence of either antibiotics or Ulva reticulata extract, it is tempting to speculate that such phenotype was related to the inhibition of bacterial growth in vivo. To assess this, we carried out colony forming assays to examine the rate of bacterial growth in the flies. As shown in Figure 3, treatment of infected flies with either tetracycline or 25 mg/ml Ulva reticulata extract was significantly useful to reduce the bacterial load in flies infected with S. aureus, indicating that increased survivorship of bacteria-infected flies in the presence of either tetracycline antibiotics or Ulva reticulata extract might be the result of bacterial growth inhibition.

Figure 3

Growth of bacteria in the infected- w1118 D. melanogaster in the presence or absence of treatments. Adult flies w1118 at 4-7 days after eclosion were infected with 1 x 105 cfu/ml of S. aureus ATCC 29213 by pricking and incubated at 25oC in the presence of 25 mg/ml of Ulva reticulata extracts then followed by bacterial load analysis. Flies treated with tetracycline at 200 µg/ml were used as a positive control group.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-10-5-993_g005.jpg

Beneficial effects of Ulva reticulata extract in the immunodeficient model system

Increased survival rate of infected host and reduction of the bacterial load might result from direct interaction of compounds contained in the extract with the bacteria found in the infected flies. However, previous experiments carried out in this research did not rule out the possible stimulation of host immune response that finally resulted in the inhibition of bacterial growth thus yielding the rescue effects observed in the antibiotic-treated or extract-treated bacteria-infected-w1118. To examine which of the possibilities was true, we performed infection experiments on two mutant flies lacking either humoral or cellular immune responses.

We used flies with Toll-lacking (humoral immunodeficient) and Draper-lacking (cellular immunodeficient) phenotypes that have been demonstrated to be prone to Gram-positive bacteria. As shown in Figure 4A, humoral immunodeficient mutant flies (Toll mutant flies) succumbed faster with higher bacterial load than the control flies upon infection with S. aureus. This indicates that Toll immunodeficient flies were more sensitive to bacterial infection, supporting the reports of previous investigators.33,35 Furthermore, treatment of the infected-immunodeficient flies with food containing ethanolic extract of Ulva reticulata at concentration of 25 mg/ml increased the survivorship of infected Toll mutant flies and reduced the bacterial load recovered from the corresponding mutant flies (Figure 4A). Similar results were also observed in Draper mutant flies lacking for cellular innate immunity (Figure 4B). This mutant fly lacking for cellular innate immunity known to provide protection against S. aureus could survived longer in the presence of tetracycline or crude extract of Ulva reticulata. Taken together, these results suggested that Ulva reticulata extract yielded its antibacterial activity against S. aureus via direct interaction of compounds available in the extract with bacteria and was not due to stimulation of Toll signaling pathway (humoral innate immune response) or activation of cellular immune responses via Draper recognition of S. aureus.

Figure 4

Analysis of host survival and enumeration of bacterial load in infected immunodeficient flies in the presence or absence of treatments. Adult immunodeficient Toll-lacking (A) or Draper-lacking (B) flies at 4-7 days after eclosion were infected with 1 x 105 cfu/ml of S. aureus (ATCC 29213) by pricking, incubated at 25oC in the presence of either 200 µg/ml tetracycline or 25 mg/ml of Ulva reticulata extract, and subjected to fly survival and bacterial load analysis. Flies treated with tetracycline at 200 µg/ml were used as a positive control group.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-10-5-993_g001.jpghttps://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-10-5-993_g004.jpg

CONCLUSION

In this research, we showed, for the first time, the antibacterial effect of Ulva reticulata through the application of a genetically tractable D. melanogaster as an in vivo bacterial infection model system. Such simple and inexpensive in vivo platform can provide a high-throughput result in the screening of medicinal plant crude extracts and/or other antibiotic-producing samples prior to further processing steps such as isolation of responsible antibiotic compounds, in vivo testing using mammalian models of bacterial infection, and elucidation of antibiotic mechanisms of actions.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This work was supported by a Benua Maritim Indonesia Spesifik (BMIS) Grant (provided by Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia) to F.N. We are grateful to Prof. Yoshinobu Nakanishi (Kanazawa University, Japan) for the fly lines and we thank Prof. Gemini Alam and Prof. Elly Wahyudin (Hasanuddin University, Indonesia) for their valuable suggestions and support. We also acknowledge the use of Flybase.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

ABBREVIATION USED

ANOVA

Analysis of variance

ATCC

American Type Culture Collection

BMIS

Benua Maritim Indonesia Spesifik

CFU

Colony-forming unit

NB

Nutrient Broth.

REFERENCES

1. 

Levy SB, Marshall B , authors. Antibacterial resistance worldwide: Causes, challenges and responses. Nat. Med. 2004;10(12s):S122

2. 

Alekshun MN, Levy SB , authors. Molecular mechanisms of antibacterial multidrug resistance. Cell. 2007;128(6):1037–50

3. 

Yeh PJ , author. et al. Drug interactions and the evolution of antibiotic resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7(6):460

4. 

Rolain JM , author. et al. Do we need new antibiotics? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016

5. 

Sommer MO , author. et al. Prediction of antibiotic resistance: Time for a new preclinical paradigm? Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15(11):689

6. 

Luepke KH , author. et al. Past, present, and future of antibacterial economics: Increasing bacterial resistance, limited antibiotic pipeline, and societal implications. Pharmacother J Hum Pharmacol. Drug Ther. 2017;37(1):71–84

7. 

Lewis K , author. Platforms for antibiotic discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013;12(5):371

8. 

Cooper MA , author. A community-based approach to new antibiotic discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015;14(9):587

9. 

Butler MS, Blaskovich MA, Cooper MA , authors. Antibiotics in the clinical pipeline at the end of 2015. J Antibiot. 2016;70(1):3

10. 

Tzelepis I , author. et al. Drosophila melanogaster: A first step and a stepping-stone to anti-infectives. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2013;13(5):763–8

11. 

García-Lara J, Needham AJ, Foster SJ , authors. Invertebrates as animal models for Staphylococcus aureus pathogenesis: A window into host-pathogen interaction. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2005;43(3):311–23

12. 

Wright GD, Something old , authors. something new: Revisiting natural products in antibiotic drug discovery. Canad J Microbiol. 2014;60(3):147–54

13. 

Mostafa AA , author. et al. Antimicrobial activity of some plant extracts against bacterial strains causing food poisoning diseases. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2017

14. 

Radji M , author. et al. Antimicrobial activity of green tea extract against isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2013;3(8):663–7

15. 

Kusuma IW , author. et al. Antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of medicinal plants used by the Bentian tribe from Indonesia. Food Sci. Human Wellness. 2014;3(3):191–6

16. 

Pandey UB, Nichols CD , authors. Human disease models in Drosophila melanogaster and the role of the fly in therapeutic drug discovery. Pharmacol Rev. 2011;63(2):411–36

17. 

Ugur BK, Chen HJ , authors. Bellen, Drosophila tools and assays for the study of human diseases. Dis Models Mech. 2016;9(3):235–44

18. 

Hoffmann JA , author. The immune response of Drosophila. Nature. 2003;426(6962):33

19. 

Buchon NN, Cherry SS , authors. Immunity in Drosophila melanogaster - from microbial recognition to whole-organism physiology. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14(12):796

20. 

Mussabekova A, Daeffler L, Imler JL , authors. Innate and intrinsic antiviral immunity in Drosophila. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017;74(11):2039–54

21. 

Nainu F , author. et al. Protection of insects against viral infection by apoptosis-dependent phagocytosis. J Immunol. 2015;195(12):5696–706

22. 

Nainu F, Shiratsuchi A, Nakanishi Y , authors. Induction of apoptosis and subsequent phagocytosis of virus-infected cells as an antiviral mechanism. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1220

23. 

Willoughby LF , author. et al. An in vivo large-scale chemical screening platform using Drosophila for anti-cancer drug discovery. Dis Models Mech. 2013;6(2):521–9

24. 

Fernández‐Hernández I , author. et al. The translational relevance of Drosophila in drug discovery. EMBO rep. 2016;17(4):471–2

25. 

Ekowati H , author. et al. Protective effects of Phaseolus vulgaris lectin against viral infection in Drosophila. Drug Discov Ther. 2017;11(6):329–35

26. 

Needham AJ , author. et al. Drosophila melanogaster as a model host for Staphylococcus aureus infection. Microbiol. 2004;150(7):2347–55

27. 

Apidianakis Y, Rahme LG , authors. Drosophila melanogaster as a model host for studying Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Nat Protoc. 2009;4(9):1285–94

28. 

Jensen A , author. et al. Processing plant persistent strains of Listeria monocytogenes appear to have a lower virulence potential than clinical strains in selected virulence models. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008;123(3):254–61

29. 

Castonguay-Vanier J , author. et al. Drosophila melanogaster as a model host for the Burkholderia cepacia complex. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(7):e11467

30. 

Guichard A , author. et al. Anthrax toxins cooperatively inhibit endocytic recycling by the Rab11/Sec15 exocyst. Nature. 2010;467(7317):854

31. 

Dhanya KI , author. et al. Antimicrobial activity of Ulva reticulata and its endophytes. J Ocean Univ China. 2016;15(2):363–9

32. 

Al-Saif SS , author. et al. Antibacterial substances from marine algae isolated from Jeddah coast of Red sea, Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2014;21(1):57–64

33. 

Neyen C , author. et al. Methods to study Drosophila immunity. Methods. 2014;68(1):116–28

34. 

Hashimoto Y , author. et al. Identification of lipoteichoic acid as a ligand for Draper in the phagocytosis of Staphylococcus aureus by Drosophila hemocytes. J Immunol. 2009;183(11):7451–60

35. 

Shiratsuchi A , author. et al. Independent recognition of Staphylococcus aureus by two receptors for phagocytosis in Drosophila. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(26):21663–72

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-10-5-993_g006.jpg

SUMMARY

  • Drosophila melanogaster can be infected by human pathogen such as Staphylococcus aureus thus prospective to be used as infection model system in drug discovery research.

  • Using D. melanogaster infection model, antibacterial activity of Ulva reticulata against S. aureus was assessed in vivo.

  • Improvement of host survival accompanied by reduction in bacterial load were observed in S. aureus-infected D. melanogaster upon treatment with ethanolic extract of Ulva reticulata.

  • Ethanolic extract of Ulva reticulata yield in vivo antibacterial effect against Staphylococcus aureus in D. melanogaster model of infection.

ABOUT AUTHORS

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-10-5-993_g007.jpg

Firzan Nainu is a lecturer in the Pharmacology and Toxicology Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia. He completed his Doctoral program in Pharmaceutical Sciences at Kanazawa University, Japan, in 2016. He is involved in research dealing with host defense and responses against diverse array of pathogens by using Drosophila and other available model systems. In addition, he is interested in the establishment of various in vivo model systems for drug discovery.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-10-5-993_g008.jpg

Rangga Meidianto Asri is a junior lecturer in the Faculty of Pharmacy at Hasanuddin University. He completed his education in Pharmaceutical science at Hasanuddin University in 2011 and have been involved in Department of Pharmaceutics since 2014. His current research interests include investigation of extracts and fractions containing potential bioactive compounds from natural plants and their mechanism of actions as anti-infection.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-10-5-993_g009.jpg

Aryadi Arsyad is an academic staff in Physiology Department, Faculty of Medicine at Hasanuddin University. He has completed his medical doctor at Hasanuddin University and his postgraduate degrees at James Cook University. Aryadi’s current research and publications focus on understanding the mechanism and target of drug on cells and tissues.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-10-5-993_g010.jpg

Marianti A. Manggau is a lecturer that currently holds a Professor title in the field of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmacology at Faculty of Pharmacy, Hasanuddin University. She completed her doctoral programme funded by DAAD at Freie Universitaet zu Berlin, Germany. As a Head of Biopharmacy and Pharmacology Toxicology Laboratory, her recent research interests are potential and preclinical study of secondary metabolite compounds from natural resources as antibiotic, antioxidant, and anticancer drugs.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jourdata/pj/PharmacognJ-10-5-993_g011.jpg

Muhammad Nur Amir is currently working as an academic staff in pharmacology and toxicology laboratory at Faculty of Pharmacy, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia. He received the bachelor degree in faculty of pharmacy, hasanuddin university, Indonesia in 2009. He received prestigious postgraduate scholarship from the Indonesian Goverment (BU DN DIKTI) for completing his master degree program in Pharmacy, Hasanuddin University in 2015. He is interested in working in the field of pharmacology and toxicology, especially in molecular pharmacology using animal model.